Skip to content

Simulation Training for Adolescent Leukemia Care in Nursing Students

The Effect of Scenario-Based Simulation Training for Adolescent Leukemia Care on Nursing Students' Perceived Stress, Knowledge, and Learning Satisfaction: A Mixed-Methods Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07660770
Enrollment
18
Registered
2026-06-22
Start date
2026-05-18
Completion date
2026-06-16
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Nursing Education, Simulation Training, Stress, Psychological

Keywords

simulation-based learning, nursing students, adolescent leukemia, extravasation, perceived stress, debriefing, mixed methods, student satisfaction, PEARLS model

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects of scenario-based simulation training for adolescent leukemia care on nursing students' perceived stress, knowledge level, and learning satisfaction. Nursing students often encounter challenges when managing complex clinical situations involving pediatric oncology patients. Simulation-based education may help students develop clinical skills and confidence in a safe learning environment. The study investigates whether participation in an adolescent leukemia simulation scenario improves students' knowledge related to extravasation management, affects their perceived stress levels, and enhances their learning satisfaction. In addition, students' experiences and perceptions regarding the simulation training will be explored through qualitative interviews.

Detailed description

Simulation-based education is increasingly used in nursing programs to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. Pediatric oncology care requires specialized knowledge and clinical decision-making skills, particularly in managing complications such as chemotherapy extravasation. However, nursing students often have limited opportunities to encounter such situations during clinical placements. This mixed-methods study will evaluate the effectiveness of an adolescent leukemia scenario-based simulation training program among third-year nursing students. The quantitative component will employ a single-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. Participants will complete baseline assessments before the simulation intervention and follow-up assessments immediately after the simulation and debriefing sessions. The simulation scenario focuses on the recognition and management of chemotherapy extravasation in an adolescent patient with leukemia. The intervention will be conducted in a simulation laboratory using a structured process including prebriefing, simulation implementation, and debriefing based on the Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) framework. Quantitative outcomes will include perceived stress, knowledge regarding extravasation management, and learning satisfaction. Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured focus group interviews conducted after the simulation experience. The qualitative findings will provide a deeper understanding of participants' experiences, perceptions, clinical reasoning processes, and learning outcomes. Data will be analyzed using appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical methods for the quantitative component and thematic analysis for the qualitative component. Findings from both components will be integrated to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the educational effectiveness of adolescent leukemia scenario-based simulation training in undergraduate nursing education.

Interventions

A simulation-based educational intervention consisting of prebriefing (3 min), environmental orientation (3 min), scenario-based simulation on extravasation management in an adolescent leukemia patient (10 min), and structured debriefing using the PEARLS model (30 min). Pre- and post-tests were administered to assess perceived stress, knowledge level, and student satisfaction.

Sponsors

Atılım University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single-group pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design with mixed methods approach. All participants underwent scenario-based simulation training on adolescent leukemia/extravasation management.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Third-year nursing students enrolled at Atılım University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing * Voluntary participation in the study * Not having previously taken the NURS302 - Child Health and Diseases course

Exclusion criteria

* Withdrawal from the study at any stage * Incomplete completion of data collection forms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extravasation Knowledge LevelBaseline (pre-simulation) and immediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation, approximately 1 hour later)Change in nursing students' knowledge about extravasation management, assessed using a 10-item multiple-choice knowledge test developed by the researchers. Each correct answer scores 1 point (total: 0-10). Higher scores indicate better knowledge.
Perceived Stress LevelBaseline (pre-simulation) and immediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation, approximately 1 hour later)Change in perceived stress measured with the Nursing Student Perceived Stress Scale (NSPSS; Karaca et al., 2015), a 29-item, 5-point Likert scale with 6 subscales. Total scores range from 0 to 116; higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in LearningImmediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation only, approximately 1 hour after baseline)Student satisfaction assessed using the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (NLN; Turkish adaptation by Karaçay \& Kaya, 2017), a 13-item, 5-point Likert scale with 2 subscales. Scores range from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction and self-confidence.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDidem Yüksel, PhD

Atilim University School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 23, 2026