Skip to content

Feasibility of an Enhanced Symptom Monitoring and Expedited Subspecialty Care Referral Intervention to Improve Side Effect Management for Patients With Melanoma Receiving an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

EMPOWER: Enhancing Melanoma Care Through Patient-Reported Outcomes Monitoring With Early, Rapid Immunotherapy Toxicity Subspecialty Care

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07660666
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-06-22
Start date
2026-11-01
Completion date
2029-06-01
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Brief summary

This clinical trial tests the feasibility of patient reported outcomes monitoring with early, rapid immunotherapy toxicity subspecialty care to improve side effect management for patients with melanoma receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma, but their use is frequently complicated by immune related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs can affect any organ system, range in severity from mild to life threatening, and often require a pause or stopping of immunotherapy treatment. Early identification and management of irAEs may reduce progression to severe toxicity. Electronic patient self reporting of symptoms with ways to support early involvement of non oncology subspecialists may be a feasible way to improve side effect management for patients with melanoma receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Determine the feasibility of an electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom monitoring and subspecialty care referral intervention for identifying and managing irAEs in patients with melanoma. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate intervention acceptability for key stakeholders, including patients, caregivers, oncologists, and subspecialists. II. Describe the preliminary efficacy of the intervention to improve management of irAEs. OUTLINE: Patients complete an ePRO assessment, where they rate the frequency and/or severity of symptoms that may indicate a moderate to severe irAE, weekly for 6 months. If a patient rates a symptom at a frequency or severity level of moderate or higher, a care provider is notified and determines if the symptoms warrant evaluation by a non-oncology subspecialist or can be managed by medical oncology. Patients receive a referral to an appropriate subspecialist, complete an evaluation of the suspected irAE, within 14 days of the referral, and receive standard of care treatment. Patients may optionally have their caregiver enroll to complete an intervention acceptability survey.

Interventions

OTHERElectronic Health Record Review

Ancillary studies

OTHERInternet-Based Intervention

Receive access to ePRO tool

BEHAVIORALPatient Navigation

Receive review of symptoms and referral if needed

OTHERSurvey Administration

Complete ePRO assessments

Sponsors

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* PATIENT: Age 18 years or older * PATIENT: Histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma * PATIENT: Plan to begin a standard of care (SOC) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for the treatment of melanoma per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and/or National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines * PATIENT: Willing and able to provide informed consent * CAREGIVER: Age 18 years or older * CAREGIVER: Family member or primary caregiver of a study participant

Exclusion criteria

* PATIENT: Previously received ICI therapy * PATIENT: Life expectancy of \< 6 months at time of enrollment * PATIENT: Concurrently receiving a non-ICI systemic therapy * PATIENT: Concurrently receiving radiation, unless hypofractionated palliative radiation prescribed to alleviate poorly controlled symptoms (e.g., pain) * PATIENT: Needs to rely on a proxy to complete patient-reported outcome instruments * PATIENT: Unwilling or unable to complete surveys electronically * CAREGIVER: Needs to rely on a proxy to complete survey instrument(s) * CAREGIVER: Unwilling or unable to complete surveys electronically

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of eligible patients who consent to the study and begin the intervention (feasibility of study enrollment)At enrollmentWill estimate the proportion of patients enrolled with 95% confidence intervals.
Proportion of patients evaluated by subspecialists in ≤ 14 days among participants who enrolled and developed a suspected immune related adverse events (irAE) (grade 2 or higher) (feasibility of intervention delivery)From baseline to 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients who complete data collection at 6 months (retention)At month 6Will estimate the proportion of patients retained in the study and adherent to electronic patient reported outcomes with 95% confidence intervals.
Proportion of weeks a Patient Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire was completed out of the number of weeks since starting the intervention (ePRO adherence)From baseline to 6 months
Proportion of participants rating the study as acceptable (acceptability)At 6 monthsAssessed via adapted from Basch et al's survey. Acceptability is defined as a mean summary score of 3 or higher.
Proportion of caregivers for enrolled participants rate the study as acceptable (acceptability)At 6 monthsAssessed via adapted from Basch et al's survey. Acceptability is defined as a mean summary score of 3 or higher.
Proportion of medical oncologists/subspecialists rate the study as acceptable (acceptability)At end of the study, up to 3 yearsAssessed via clinician experience measure.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDeanne Tibbitts

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 23, 2026