Skip to content

Remifentanil Monotherapy vs. Remifentanil-Nicardipine for Controlled Hypotension in Otolaryngological Surgery

The Effects of Remifentanil Monotherapy Versus Remifentanil-Nicardipine Combination on Advanced Hemodynamic Parameters for Controlled Hypotension During Otolaryngological Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07659496
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-06-22
Start date
2026-06-30
Completion date
2026-08-30
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Otolaryngological Surgery

Brief summary

Controlled hypotension is a widely employed technique in otolaryngological (ear, nose, and throat) surgery, primarily aimed at improving surgical field visibility and minimizing intraoperative blood loss. By maintaining mean arterial pressure within a targeted range, this approach facilitates a clearer operative field, reduces the need for blood transfusion, and shortens operative time, thereby contributing to improved surgical outcomes. Among the pharmacological agents used to achieve controlled hypotension, remifentanil - an ultra-short-acting synthetic opioid - has gained widespread acceptance due to its rapid onset, predictable offset, and favorable hemodynamic profile. Nicardipine, a second-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is also utilized for its potent vasodilatory properties and titratable antihypertensive effect. When used in combination, these two agents may offer complementary mechanisms of action; however, their combined impact on advanced hemodynamic parameters remains insufficiently characterized in the otolaryngological surgical setting. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of remifentanil monotherapy versus remifentanil-nicardipine combination therapy on advanced hemodynamic parameters, cardiac physiology, and tissue perfusion in patients undergoing controlled hypotension during otolaryngological surgery. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring - including parameters such as cardiac output, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, and oxygen delivery indices - will provide a more comprehensive physiological assessment beyond conventional blood pressure measurements. As secondary objectives, this study will evaluate and compare both regimens with respect to surgical field quality, surgeon satisfaction, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and perioperative adverse effects. It is anticipated that a thorough comparative analysis of these two approaches will contribute to evidence-based anesthetic decision-making and help optimize patient safety and surgical outcomes in otolaryngological procedures.

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil / Nicardipine

Co-administration of intravenous remifentanil and nicardipine infusions as part of a standardized protocol to induce and maintain controlled hypotension

DRUGRemifentanil

Standard intravenous infusion of remifentanil to maintain controlled hypotension according to the routine anesthesia protocol.

Sponsors

Dicle University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged \> 18 years * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II * Scheduled to undergo otolaryngological surgery under general anesthesia * Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Aged \< 18 years * ASA physical status III or higher * Known severe cardiovascular (coronary artery disease, heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension), respiratory, renal, or hepatic disease * Known allergy to the study drugs (remifentanil, nicardipine) * Chronic use of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or any other medication affecting blood pressure * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Morbid obesity * Emergency surgery requirement * Refusal to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiac Index (CI)Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubationCardiac Index measured via MOSTCARE hemodynamic monitor through radial arterial line (L/min/m²)
Stroke Volume Index(SVI)Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubationStroke Volume Index(SVI) measured via MOSTCARE hemodynamic monitor through radial arterial line (%)
Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRI)Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubationassessed via MOSTCARE hemodynamic monitor through radial arterial line
Cardiac Power Index (CPI)Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubationassessed via MOSTCARE hemodynamic monitor through radial arterial line

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart RatePerioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubationMean arterial pressure monitored via non-invasive blood pressure measurement (mmHg)
Surgical Field QualityIntraoperative period, approximately up to 2 hoursIntraoperative surgical field visibility assessed by the surgeon using the Fromme-Boezaart scoring system (scale 0-5; higher scores indicate worse surgical field)
Incidence of Perioperative Adverse EventsIntraoperative and postoperative period, up to 24 hoursIncidence of bradycardia, hypotension, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, and other adverse events recorded by an independent blinded assessor

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTAyhan Kaydu
akaydu@hotmail.com+90 505 556 7939

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 23, 2026