Skip to content

Evaluation of Occlusal Contact Distribution in Digitally Fabricated Implant-Retained Fixed Partial Dentures in Mandibular Kennedy Class II Patients Following Artificial Intelligence Bite Optimization: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Evaluation of Occlusal Contact Distribution in Digitally Fabricated Implant-Retained Fixed Partial Dentures in Mandibular Kennedy Class II Patients Following Artificial Intelligence Bite Optimization: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07657910
Acronym
Quasi
Enrollment
15
Registered
2026-06-18
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2026-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partially Edentulous Mandible

Keywords

Kennedy Class II, mandible, Bite optimization, implant, 3shape, Artificial intelligence, Occlusal contact

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the occlusal contact distribution in digitally fabricated implant-retained fixed partial dentures in mandibular Kennedy Class II patients before and after artificial intelligence bite optimization.

Detailed description

The recruited patients will be screened for proper bone architecture and CBCTs will be taken for proper virtual implant planning. Two implants will be placed in the edentulous span in all participants. All surgical steps will be held according to standard protocol. After the implant osseointegration period, the prosthetic phase will start with implant exposure and placement of multiunit abutments. After gingival healing, intraoral scans for the implants timing using abutment level scan bodies will be taken. Then, the fabrication of implant-retained fixed partial denture will be done with a fully digital workflow. The data acquisition will take place by scanning the patients using Medit intraoral scanner. Then, the scanned stls will be imported in 3shape software version 2024 and bite optimization module in it will be run. It automatically recalculates the position of the bite relation using its integrated AI. After that, the resulted STLs will be exported and re-imported to ExoCAD software to design the prostheses.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAfter

The data acquisition will take place by scanning the patients using Medit intraoral scanner. Then, the scanned stls will be imported in 3shape software version 2024 and bite optimization module in it will be run. It automatically recalculates the position of the bite relation using its integrated AI. After that, the resulted STLs will be exported and re-imported to ExoCAD software to design the prostheses.

PROCEDUREBefore

The recruited patients will be screened for proper bone architecture and CBCTs will be taken for proper virtual implant planning. Two implants will be placed in the edentulous span in all participants. All surgical steps will be held according to standard protocol. After the implant osseointegration period, the prosthetic phase will start with implant exposure and placement of multiunit abutments. After gingival healing, intraoral scans for the implants timing using abutment level scan bodies will be taken. Then, the fabrication of implant-retained fixed partial denture will be done with a fully digital workflow.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Statistician

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with a unilateral mandibular distal extension area (Kennedy Class II partially edentulous mandibular arch) and who are indicated for the insertion of 2 implants. 2. Fully dentate opposing maxillary arch or restored with a suitable, well constructed fixed prosthesis. 3. The remaining teeth should be in good periodontal health, with no signs of inflammation or movement. 4. The edentulous area should be covered by a healthy, firm mucoperiosteum, with no or minimal tissue undercut. 5. Patient should be with class I occlusion. 6. No occlusal disorder; stable jaw relation. 7. No TMD signs or symptoms. 8. Patients should be in generally good health and free of systemic conditions that can affect the implant treatment, such as diabetes mellitus.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with psychological or mental disorders. 2. Patients with insufficient interarch space. 3. Patients with parafunctional habits, such as bruxism. 4. After the healing phase and exactly before the prosthetic phase, if the inserted implants showed any signs of peri-implantitis or aggressive crestal bone resorption, then this case will be excluded and replaced with another case.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occlusal contact distributionFrom enrollment till the end of the study 17 weeksThe 1ry outcome will be assessed on the day of the prosthesis delivery. First, the reading of the occlusal contact distribution will be taken by using the T-scan device before seating the prosthesis intraorally. Then, the retained fixed prosthesis will be seated on the implant abutment, and the prosthetic screw will be screwed to the optimum torque. Another reading of the occlusal contact distribution will be taken by using the T-scan device after seating and torquing the prosthesis intraorally. Finally, the screw access channels will be closed by flowable resin composite material.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTNoha Walid Barakat, Masters degree
noha.barakat@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201149902334
CONTACTAhmed Mustafa Kotb, Lecturer
ahmed.kotb@dentistry.cu.edu.eg01006697790

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 19, 2026