Skip to content

RCT - Suprapatellar Approach Versus Lateral Parapatellar Approach in Tibial Shaft Fracture

Comparison of Suprapatellar Approach Versus Extra-articular Lateral Parapatellar Approach in Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07657559
Acronym
ELPP
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-06-18
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2028-08-31
Last updated
2026-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intramedullary Nail, Tibial Shaft Fracture

Keywords

suprapatellar approach, extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach, intramedullary nailing, tibial shaft fracture

Brief summary

This study aims to compare 2 surgical techniques for tibial shaft nailing (suprapatellar approach vs extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach). following peri-operative and postoperative outcomes

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial study, compared extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach with suprapatellar approach in tibial shaft nailing. peri-operative data are operative time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay. post-operative outcomes include Lysholm Knee Score, VAS-knee, range of motion. these outcomes are following postoperative day 1, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.

Interventions

semi-extended position longitudinal incision 2 cm. above patella nail insertion procedure under patellofemoral joint

PROCEDUREextra-articular lateral parapatellar approach

semi-extended position longitudinal incision 4-5 cm., lateral to patellar tendon nail insertion procedure

Sponsors

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

patients were divided into two groups using computer-generated block-of-four randomization.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age 18-60 years * tibial shaft fractures

Exclusion criteria

* pervious knee injury * open fracture at least Gustilo grade II * ipsilateral femur and ankle fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Lysholm Knee Score6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
operative timeoperation
VAS score of kneePOD 1, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
range of motionPOD 1, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsknee
intraoperative blood lossoperation
fluoroscopy timeoperation

Contacts

CONTACTTiwat Wongkasemjit M.D., Resident
toytiwat@gmail.com+66893146833

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 19, 2026