Skip to content

ESWT vs HILT in Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

Effectiveness of Shockwave Therapy Versus High-Power Laser Therapy in the Management of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07654790
Acronym
ESWT vs HILT
Enrollment
72
Registered
2026-06-17
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) and High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Detailed description

Participants will be randomly assigned into three groups receiving either conventional physiotherapy alone, ESWT plus conventional physiotherapy, or HILT plus conventional physiotherapy. Clinical assessments will be performed before and after treatment

Interventions

DEVICEExtracorporeal shock wave therapy

The Group will receive ESWT plus conventional physiotherapy treatment program. Regarding ESWT protocol, the group will receive 1,000, 1,500, and 2,000 pulses during the first, second, and third through fifth treatments, respectively (pressure, 2.5 bar; frequency, 8 Hz; energy density, 0.4 mJ/mm2). The patients received 5 ESWT treatments once per week. The treatments were performed using a Rosetta ESWT (CR Technology, Korea). Ultrasound gel was applied between the apparatus head and skin. The procedure was performed in the area with the most intense pain. Treatment was administered at the anterior aspect of the LE and three points around it at a radius of 1.5-2 cm. The treatment time did not exceed 10 minutes. During the treatments, the patients did not receive any drugs (Lizis, 2015).

OTHERConventional Physical Therapy

The conventional program will include TENS for twenty minutes in elbow region; the use of pulse ultrasound with duty cycle 80% on the lateral epicondyle for five minutes with an intensity of 0.8 W per every cm'; the use of ice for ten minutes; training for correcting the daily activities to minimize pressure on the elbow (preferentially, holding, lifting and pressing the objects will be asked to be carried out in supination); and, stretch and strain wrist muscle strengthening exercises (Fekri et al., 2019). The exercise therapy method involved six elbow joint exercises. They are a total of six exercises (Fig. 2) for patients with tennis elbow. Each exercise will be performed three times a day, with each session involving five repetitions of the movement, over four weeks, gradually increasing weight until the movement is effective but below the pain threshold. Painful movements will be avoided, and exercises causing pain or discomfort will be discontinued following consultation from a p

DEVICEHigh-power intinsty laser

The Group will receive HILT plus conventional physiotherapy treatment program. High-power laser used in the present research paper was MLS Laser, Model M6 (ASA), that will be included in class four lasers device, with maximum 25-Watt power, average power of 3.3 Watts, wavelength of 808 nm in a continuous state. The target region diameter in this device will be 5 cm and the energy used for treating the patients will be 272.4 Jules, and the energy density will be 13.89 Jules per cm' with a 700-hertz frequency for a period of three minutes on the lateral epicondyle and the origin of the wrist's extensor muscles (Fekri et al., 2019).

Sponsors

Kafrelsheikh University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Age 40-50 years. * Clinically diagnosed chronic lateral epicondylitis. * Symptoms lasting more than 3 months. * Positive clinical provocation tests. * Localized tenderness over the lateral epicondyle.

Exclusion criteria

* • Previous elbow surgery. * Corticosteroid injection within the last 6 months. * Cervical radiculopathy. * Peripheral nerve entrapment. * Rheumatologic or systemic inflammatory disorders. * Elbow fracture. * Severe elbow instability

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Pain intensity measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
2. Grip strength measured using Hand Dynamometer.at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
3. Upper limb disability measured using QuickDASH Questionnaire.at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Pressure Pain Threshold using Algometer.at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
2. Pinch Strength Measurement.at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
3. Elbow Range of Motion (ROM).at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
4. Oxford Elbow Score (OES).at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Contacts

CONTACTmohammed ALI alghamdi
pt.mohammedhajar@gmail.com=966538500550
STUDY_CHAIRMAHMOUD MOHAMMED EWIDA, PHD

Professor of Basic Sciences for Physical Therapy Department of Basic Sciences for Physical Therapy Faculty of Physical Therapy Kafrelsheikh University

STUDY_DIRECTORMOHAMMED FATHY ABDEL-GALIL

Lecturer of Basic Sciences for Physical Therapy Department of Basic Sciences for Physical Therapy Faculty of Physical Therapy Kafrelsheikh University

STUDY_DIRECTORHOSSAM MOHAMMED GAD, PHD

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty of medicine Kafrelsheikh University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 18, 2026