Football Players, Resistance Training, Resistance Training in Football Players
Conditions
Keywords
Velocity-Based Resistance Training, Traditional Resistance Training, Football Players, Athletic Performance, Neuromuscular Performance, Anaerobic Capacity, Strength Training, Load Monitoring
Brief summary
This study compared the effects of velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) and traditional resistance training (TRT) on physical performance, anaerobic capacity, and perceptual responses in trained male football players. Sixteen participants were randomly assigned to either a VBRT group or a TRT group and completed an 8-week resistance training program. The study aimed to determine whether VBRT provides greater improvements in explosive performance, anaerobic power, balance, football-specific performance, and fatigue-related perceptions compared with traditional percentage-based resistance training.
Detailed description
Resistance training is widely used in football to improve strength, power, and sport-specific performance. Traditional resistance training typically prescribes training loads based on fixed percentages of one-repetition maximum (1RM). However, this approach may not adequately account for daily fluctuations in neuromuscular readiness and fatigue. Velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) has emerged as an alternative method that uses movement velocity to individualize training load and regulate training effort. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of velocity-based resistance training and traditional percentage-based resistance training in trained male football players. Participants were randomly assigned to either a VBRT group or a traditional resistance training (TRT) group and completed an 8-week resistance training intervention consisting of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises performed twice weekly. In the VBRT group, training loads were adjusted using individualized load-velocity profiles and velocity-loss thresholds, whereas the TRT group trained using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values. The study was designed to evaluate whether individualized velocity-based load prescription could improve neuromuscular performance and fatigue management compared with traditional resistance training methods. The findings of this study may contribute to the understanding of practical resistance training strategies for football players and provide information regarding the effectiveness of velocity-based training for improving performance-related and fatigue-related adaptations.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALVelocity-Based Resistance Training
Participants completed an 8-week velocity-based resistance training program performed twice weekly. Training consisted of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises. Training loads were prescribed using individualized load-velocity profiles and adjusted according to target movement velocities and a 20% velocity-loss threshold.
BEHAVIORALTraditional Resistance Training
Participants completed an 8-week traditional percentage-based resistance training program performed twice weekly. Training consisted of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises. Training loads were prescribed using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values.
Sponsors
Sinop University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Male football players aged 18 to 25 years * Actively participating in organized football training and competition * At least 1 year of structured resistance training experience * Regular exposure to football-specific training loads * Willing and able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Musculoskeletal injury within the previous 6 months * Neurological, orthopedic, or chronic disorders affecting physical performance * Use of ergogenic aids or supplements that could influence neuromuscular performance * Participation in additional resistance training outside the study protocol * Missing more than 10% of the scheduled training sessions
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Vertical Jump Height at 8 Weeks | Baseline and Week 8 | Vertical jump height (cm) measured using a digital vertical jump device to assess lower-body explosive performance. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed