Skip to content

Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Scoring

Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery: Predictive Risk Factors and the Role of Clinical Airway Scores

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07651904
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-06-16
Start date
2026-06-27
Completion date
2027-12-30
Last updated
2026-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Obstruction, Bronchospasm, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Difficult Intubation, Laryngospasm, Postoperative Complications

Keywords

cleft lip, cleft palate, pediatric anesthesia, perioperative respiratory adverse events, Han mask ventilation score, micrognathia, intubation difficulty score

Brief summary

Cleft lip and palate surgeries present unique anesthetic challenges due to shared airway access with the surgical field, frequent anatomical abnormalities, and a predominantly infant and toddler population. These factors substantially increase the risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs), including laryngospasm, bronchospasm, desaturation, post-extubation stridor, and unanticipated re-intubation. This prospective single-center observational cohort study aims to determine the true incidence of PRAEs in pediatric patients undergoing elective cleft lip and/or palate repair under general anesthesia, and to identify independent predictive risk factors using standardized airway assessment tools including the Han Mask Ventilation Score and the Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS). No interventions beyond routine clinical practice will be applied. All airway management decisions will remain at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.

Detailed description

Cleft lip and palate are among the most common congenital craniofacial anomalies. The surgical population predominantly consists of infants and young children who may present with associated syndromes, micrognathia, retrognathia, or obstructive sleep apnea - all of which contribute to difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation. Sharing the airway with the surgical team and the use of the Dingman retractor further increase the risk of airway compromise during emergence and extubation. Published data on PRAE incidence in this population are largely retrospective and heterogeneous, and no adequately powered prospective study has systematically evaluated predictive risk factors using validated scoring systems. Study Design: Prospective, single-center, observational cohort study conducted at Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. No interventions beyond established routine anesthesia protocols will be performed. Parental written informed consent will be obtained prior to enrollment. Anesthetic Protocol: All patients will undergo standard intraoperative monitoring (ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, end-tidal CO₂). Anesthesia will be induced with sevoflurane inhalation followed by intravenous induction after vascular access. Maintenance will be achieved with sevoflurane and remifentanil infusion. Analgesia and perioperative steroid administration will follow the department's routine protocol. Data Collection: Preoperative variables: age, weight, cleft type (unilateral/bilateral/isolated lip/isolated palate/combined), cleft width and depth, alveolar gap, micrognathia, retrognathia, cervical extension limitation, OSAS history, Pierre Robin sequence, and prior ICU admission. Intraoperative variables: induction type and agents, neuromuscular blockade use, operator experience level, mask ventilation difficulty (Han Score), number of intubation attempts, laryngoscopy device used, Cormack-Lehane grade, VIDIAC score, IDS score, adjunct airway tools employed, minimum SpO₂ and bradycardia during intubation, Dingman retractor duration, and steroid use. Primary outcome assessment: extubation-related minimum SpO₂, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, post-extubation stridor, coughing episodes, and need for unplanned re-intubation or ICU admission. Vital signs (heart rate, SpO₂, blood pressure) will be recorded at intubation, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics will be reported as mean ± SD or median (IQR) for continuous variables and as n (%) for categorical variables. Univariate comparisons between PRAE and non-PRAE groups will employ independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Independent predictors of PRAE will be identified via binary logistic regression (backward stepwise method), reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance threshold: p\<0.05. Sample Size: Based on a reported PRAE incidence of \ 25% in comparable populations, a minimum of 120 patients is required (α=0.05, power=80%, G\*Power 3.1). Accounting for anticipated dropout and exclusions, the target enrollment is 140-150 patients.

Interventions

OTHERStandard General Anesthesia per Institutional Protocol

No interventions beyond routine clinical anesthesia practice. All airway management decisions, including induction technique, laryngoscopy device selection, and extubation strategy, are made at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Observational data collection only.

Sponsors

Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Years to 3 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Age 0-3 years (infants and toddlers) * Scheduled for elective cleft lip and/or palate repair surgery * General anesthesia planned * Written parental/guardian informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-existing respiratory failure or active tracheostomy * Emergency surgical procedures * Inability to obtain parental/guardian consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events (PRAEs)first 24 hours from anesthesia induction. assessed up to 24 hours postoperatively.From anesthesia induction to discharge from the hospital.Composite outcome defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following: laryngospasm, bronchospasm, post-extubation stridor, oxygen desaturation lasting \>10 seconds (SpO₂ \<90%), or unplanned re-intubation, occurring at any point from induction through PACU discharge

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Independent Predictors of PRAE - Odds Ratiosfirst 24 hours from anesthesia induction. assessed up to 24 hours postoperatively.From anesthesia induction to discharge from the hospital.Identification of independent risk factors for PRAE via binary logistic regression, including Han Mask Ventilation Score, IDS, age, cleft type, micrognathia, retrognathia, OSAS, Pierre Robin sequence, and passive smoke exposure. Results reported as OR (95% CI).
Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS)IntraoperativeComposite intubation difficulty score (Adnet 1997) calculated as N1-N7 sum; IDS ≥5 defined as difficult intubation.
Han Mask Ventilation ScoreIntraoperative, at time of mask ventilationFour-point scale assessing difficulty of mask ventilation; score ≥2 considered indicative of elevated PRAE risk.
Minimum SpO₂ During IntubationLowest pulse oximetry value recorded during laryngoscopy and intubation attempts.Intraoperative
Minimum SpO₂ During ExtubationLowest pulse oximetry value recorded during and immediately after extubation.At extubation
Postoperative ICU Admission RateWithin 24 hours of surgeryProportion of patients requiring unplanned postoperative intensive care unit admission.
Postoperative Hospital Length of StayFrom surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 daysTotal duration of hospital stay in days.

Contacts

CONTACTDilara Göçmen
dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr+90 216 625 45 45
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORdilara göçmen

Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 17, 2026