Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Sensory Neuronopathies: the Neuronoscore Study

Clinical Evaluation of Sensory Neuronopathies: the Neuronoscore Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07651540
Acronym
NEURONOSCORE
Enrollment
70
Registered
2026-06-16
Start date
2026-07-06
Completion date
2028-06-25
Last updated
2026-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sensory Neuronopathy

Keywords

neurology, specific scale, rare neuropathy

Brief summary

Sensory neuronopathies (SN) are a group of rare neuropathies characterized by selective destruction of sensory neurons located in the dorsal root ganglia. SN may result from a wide range of etiologies, particularly paraneoplastic, autoimmune, toxic, and genetic causes. The functional prognosis of patients with SN is generally poor: in a recent study, two-thirds of patients had a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥3 and nearly half had an mRS ≥4. The absence of reliable biomarkers in neuropathies justifies the use of clinical scales as indicators of disease severity, disability, and treatment response. However, none of the currently available "general neuropathy" scales have been specifically designed or validated for SN. The only scale developed specifically for SN is the SEARS (Sensory Ataxia Rating Scale), proposed in 2019, but it has not been widely used nor validated in large populations. As a result, the absence of a clinical scale specifically designed for patients with SN makes longitudinal follow-up more challenging, particularly when assessing the response to immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatments when these therapies are indicated.

Interventions

OTHERLongitudinal monitoring of clinical assessment scores to identify the most appropriate tool for tracking disease progression in sensory neuronopathies.

After patient consent, three follow-up visits (T0, T6, T12) will be scheduled. Some information will already be collected at baseline (demographics, medical history, comorbidities). Three visits will be conducted: (T0), Follow-up at 6 months (T6), Follow-up at 12 months (T12) At each visit the following will be assessed: Clinical scales: mISS, SEARS, CADT, SARA, ONLS, I-RODS, 9-Hole Peg Test, Timed Up and Go test, mRS, Quantified Rydel tuning fork test, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ENMG including sensory nerve action potentials of the radial and sural nerves (antidromic recording

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security system * Patient having received appropriate study information * Adult patient ≥18 years old, male or female * Patient diagnosed with probable SN according to Camdessanché et al. diagnostic criteria * SN with one of the following etiologies: Paraneoplastic SN with anti-Hu or anti-CV2/CRMP5 antibodies SN associated with Sjögren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, or primary biliary cholangitis Platinum-salt-induced SN SN caused by CANVAS syndrome

Exclusion criteria

* Patient unable to understand or read French * Patient refusal to participate * Patient known to have another neuropathy phenotype and/or etiology that could significantly influence clinical scales and electrophysiological parameters, including: * Diabetes mellitus * Significant alcohol consumption * Severe chronic kidney disease (GFR \<30 ml/min) * Vitamin B12 and/or vitamin E deficiency * Vitamin B6 excess * Chemotherapy other than platinum salts * HIV infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) and The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C).6 months and 12 monthsGlobal Impression of change measure evaluating overall change in clinical status compared with baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
miSS Score change6 months and 12 monthsChange in mISS score from baseline.
SEARS change6 months, 12 monthsChange in SEARS score from baseline.
CADT change6 months and 12 monthsChange in CADT score from baseline.
SARA change6 months and 12 monthsChange in SARA score from baseline.
ONLS change6 months and 12 monthsChange in ONLS score from baseline.
I-RODS change6 months and 12 monthsChange in I-RODS score from baseline.
9-Hole Peg Test change6 months and 12 monthsChange in 9-Hole Peg Test score from baseline.
Timed Up and Go test change6 months and 12 monthsChange in Timed Up and Go test from baseline
Modified Rankin Scale change6 months and 12 monthsChange in Modified Rankin Scale from baseline
Quantified Rydel tuning fork test change6 months and 12 monthsChange in Quantified Rydel tuning fork test from baseline
Visual Analog Scale change6 months and 12 monthsChange in Visual Analog scale frome baseline
Electroneuromyography6 months and 12 monthsChange in Electroneuromyography from baseline

Countries

France, Switzerland

Contacts

CONTACTJean philippe PHD CAMDESSANCHE
j.philippe.camdessanche@chu-st-etienne.fr+33 4 77 12 05 59
CONTACTClara PFENNINGER
clara.pfenninger@chu-st-etienne.fr+33 4 77 12 02 87

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 11, 2026