Skip to content

Comparing the Efficacy of the LDA, LHAA, and DA Regimens in Young Adults With Low-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy of the LDA, LHAA, and DA Regimens in Young Adults With Low-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07651176
Enrollment
267
Registered
2026-06-16
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Lisaftoclax

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukemia; Lisaftoclax

Brief summary

This is a phase II/III, multicenter, randomized, three-arm, open-label, parallel controlled trial. The primary objective of this study is to compare the 2-years EFS rate of the LDA, LHAA, and DA regimens in newly diagnosed patients with low-risk acute myeloid leukemia who are eligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Interventions

Lisaftoclax (200 mg on D2, 400 mg on D3, and 600 mg qd on D4-8, orally) + daunorubicin (60 mg/m², iv, qd, D1-3) + cytarabine (100 mg/m², q12h, subcutaneous injection or iv infusion, D1-7).

Lisaftoclax (200 mg on D2, 400 mg on D3, and 600 mg qd on D4-8, orally) + homoharringtonine (2 mg/m², qd, intramuscular injection or iv infusion, D1-5) + cytarabine (100 mg/m², q12h, subcutaneous injection or iv infusion, D1-5) + aclarubicin (12 mg/m², maximum 20 mg, iv, D1-5).

Daunorubicin (60 mg/m², iv, qd, D1-3) + cytarabine (100 mg/m², q12h, subcutaneous injection or iv infusion, D1-7).

DRUGLisaftoclax+cytarabine

Lisaftoclax (600 mg, orally, D1-7) + intermediate-dose cytarabine (2 g/m², q12h, D1-3) for 3 cycles

Lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) + azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first.

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confirmed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification; 2. Classified as intermediate- or adverse-risk AML based on the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 genetic risk stratification; 3. Age 18-65 years; 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2; 5. Adequate hepatic and renal function: total bilirubin ≤2 mg/dL (35 μmol/L); aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2× the upper limit of normal; serum creatinine ≤177 μmol/L; 6. Normal cardiac function, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \>50%; 7. Life expectancy ≥3 months; 8. Signed written informed consent by the patient or their legally authorized representative prior to study enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute promyelocytic leukemia; 2. Central nervous system involvement by leukemia; 3. History of other malignancies within the past 5 years; 4. Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); 5. Presence of any other serious medical condition that may limit study participation, including advanced infections, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, severe cardiac insufficiency, or angina; 6. Ineligible for intensive chemotherapy due to poor general condition; 7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women; 8. Inability to understand or comply with the study protocol; 9. Inability to take oral medication or presence of malabsorption syndrome; 10. Prior treatment with B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors or hypomethylating agents, or current participation in any other investigational drug study; 11. Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2-year event-free survival (EFS) ratefrom randomization up to 2 years after randomizationdefined as the proportion of patients remaining free of treatment failure, hematologic relapse, MRD relapse, or death within 2 years after randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Response (CR) rate after 1/2 treatment cyclesAt the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR) after the first or second cycle of induction chemotherapy.
Composite Complete Response (CRc) rate after 1/2 treatment cyclesAt the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)defined as the proportion of patients achieving CRc after the first or second cycle of induction chemotherapy.
Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate after 1-2 cycles of induction chemotherapyAt the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)defined as the the proportion of patients with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) among patients who achieve complete remission after 1-2 cycles of induction chemotherapy
2-year overall survival rate (OS)from randomization up to 2 yearsdefined as the proportion of patients who were still alive from the time of randomization for the last patient until 24 months later
2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) ratefrom the date of complete remission (CR/CRi) up to 2 years after achieving responsedefined as the proportion of patients who achieved complete response (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and remained alive without disease relapse within 2 years after achieving response.
Safety and Tolerabilityup to 24 monthsdefined as the number of participants with adverse events and serious adverse events as assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 17, 2026