Skip to content

Bispectral Index in Patients Undergoing Vertebral Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Programs: A Methodological Study

INTERPRETATION AND EVULATION OF THE PROXIMITY TO CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF BISPECTRAL INDEX (BIS) IN PATIENTS UNDERGOİNG VERTEBRAL SURGERY USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07650604
Acronym
BIS
Enrollment
63
Registered
2026-06-16
Start date
2026-06-10
Completion date
2026-12-10
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Artifical Intelligence, Bispectral Index, Spine

Keywords

artificial intelligence, bispectral index, vertebra surgery

Brief summary

This study aims to interpret the Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring method, which we routinely use for monitoring in scoliosis surgery, with artificial intelligence (AI) tools and to determine the accuracy and reliability of AI tools in clinical practice by comparing this interpretation with the interpretations of two clinicians experienced in BIS.

Detailed description

The Bispectral Index (BIS) is an FDA-approved method for monitoring the depth of anesthesia. BIS combines time-domain, frequency-domain, and bispectral analysis of electroencephalography and is displayed as a dimensionless number between 0 (deep anesthesia) and 100 (awake); a value between 40 and 60 is suitable for surgical anesthesia. BIS shows good correlation with hypnotic state and anesthetic drug concentration, and its use can shorten recovery times. Recently, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools (Gemini 3.1, ChatCPT 5.5, Copilot 365 Premium) has become widespread in all fields. However, in the medical literature, there are only a limited number of recent studies that aim to enable emergency intervention in patients, increase clinical use, and obtain advice even if treatment recommendations are not available. Therefore, this study aims to interpret the BIS monitoring method, which we routinely use for monitoring in scoliosis surgery, with AI tools and to determine the accuracy and reliability of AI tools in clinical practice by comparing this interpretation with the interpretations of two clinicians experienced in BIS.

Interventions

CHATGPT responses

OTHERGEMİNİ group

GEMİNİ responses

OTHERCOPİLOT group

COPİLOT responses

Clinicians responses

Sponsors

Antalya Health Sciences University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* elective vertebra surgery * aged 18-65 * ASA score I-III * BMI \<30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* patient's refusal * BMI \>30 kg/m2 * serious liver or kidney disease * ASA 4 ve more * anatomical abnormality at probe site * history of mental or neurological disease, * history of previous intracranial aneurysm or intracranial tumor surgery * history of moderate or severe pulmonary disease, * emergency surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Experience12 hoursThe proximity of AI programs to the clinical experience. The study will examine the percentage of times AI programs' interpretations and intervention recommendations regarding information processing stimulus (ISIS) are identical to those of two clinical practitioners.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTTayfun Sugur, specialezed
drtyfnsgr@gmail.com+90 534 564 79 09
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTayfun Sugur

University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026