Skip to content

Stimulating the Aging Brain Using Brain and Sensory Stimulation

Stimulating the Aging Brain: Noninvasive Brain and Sensory Stimulation Strategies in Aging

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07650188
Acronym
StAB
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-06-16
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2035-05-30
Last updated
2026-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Progressive Aphasia

Keywords

Transcranial alternating current stimulation, Multisensory stimulation

Brief summary

The goal of this project is to investigate whether transcranial electrical stimulation and sensory stimulation affect language outcomes in individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) affect verbal short-term memory (STM) in individuals with PPA? Does a single session of multisensory stimulation affect verbal STM in individuals with PPA? Researchers will compare active tACS to sham tACS (a fake stimulation condition) to see if active tACS improves verbal STM. Researchers will compare pre-multisensory stimulation to post-stimulation performance to see if multisensory stimulation improves verbal STM. Participants will: Undergo EEG, MRI (anatomical and functional) May complete a cognitive exam Undergo tACS over 3 separate sessions Undergo multisensory stimulation Complete language tasks before, during and/or after stimulation

Detailed description

The primary objective of the current project is to examine the effects of tACS and multisensory stimulation on verbal STM outcomes in individuals with PPA. The selection of parameters will be guided on the basis of oscillatory brain activity using language task-based or task-free EEG paradigms. Neuroimaging (MRI and functional MRI) will guide spatial targets of tACS. A secondary objective is to explore sources of individual variability in response to stimulation and whether these factors could offer insight into disease progression. This proof-of-concept, pilot project will generate essential preliminary data to help refine hypotheses for future clinical trials aimed at assessing the efficacy of these intervention strategies in predicting and treating (as in delaying) disease progression.

Interventions

DEVICEtACS or multisensory stimulation

Active or sham tACS Light and/or sound flickers

Sponsors

Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Participants and personnel scoring the outcomes will be blinded.

Intervention model description

In a within-subject design, participants will receive in-phase tACS, anti-phase tACS and sham tACS with spatial targets and tACS frequency guided by baseline fMRI and EEG results. Participants will also undergo multisensory stimulation using light and/or sound flickers provided in the gamma range during a session separate from tACS.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical exam supports diagnosis of PPA and/or MCI with no report of difficulty functioning in basic or instrumental activities of daily living. * Completed clinical cognitive exam within 6 months of study baseline visit OR neuropsychological research battery within 6 months of study baseline visit.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of dementia at baseline * Known history of neoplasm, symptomatic stroke, moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, or other significant neurologic event * Age \<45 years. * Evidence of severe psychiatric illness (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia). * Presence of cardiac stimulators or pacemakers * Any other implants near the scalp or in the eye * Contraindications to MRI or stimulation * Pregnancy * History of ongoing or unmanaged seizures * History of dyslexia or other developmental learning disabilities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in STM capacity assessed using a verbal STM taskChanges monitored over pre, during and immediately after 20 minutes of tACSImprovement in STM capacity with in-phase tACS and worsening of STM capacity with anti-phase tACS compared to sham tACS
Changes in STM capacity with multisensory stimulation using a verbal STM taskChanges monitored pre and immediately after 20 minutes of stimulationImprovement in STM capacity post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTSidney Schoenrock, MA
sschoenrock@mcw.edu414-955-7579
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPriyanka Shah-Basak, PhD

Medical College of Wisconsin

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 17, 2026