Prophylactic Pulmonary Vein Isolation During Atrial Flutter Ablation

Atrial Flutter Typical

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) via catheter ablation has been successfully employed for years to treat symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Moreover, PVI has not been used as a prophylactic intervention even in groups known to be high-risk for the future development of AF. Preliminary studies, including our pilot PREVENT AF I randomized trial, suggested that prophylactic PVI may be effective at reducing new onset AF and overall AF burden in atrial flutter (AFL) patients. This is a multicenter single-blind randomized controlled trial, "Prophylactic Pulmonary Vein Isolation During Atrial Flutter Ablation" (PREVENT AF II) to determine if PVI in conjunction with AFL ablation for patients with typical AFL results in a significant reduction in cardiac events and healthcare utilization.

Atrial flutter (AFL) is a distinct arrhythmic entity with a recognizable ECG phenotype resulting from a well characterized atrial arrhythmia mechanism. Typical AFL results from a single reentrant circuit located in the right atrium. The circuit is large and entirely confined to the right atrium, revolving around the tricuspid annulus. The reentrant circuit rotates in a counterclockwise direction, caudocranial along the interatrial septum and craniocaudal along the right atrial free wall. An area of slow conduction exists in the posterior-inferior aspect of the circuit, with a fully excitable gap. It is believed that most circuits utilize an anatomic or functional obstacle in the posterior right atrium, such as the crista terminalis and inferior vena cava. AFL is diagnosed in about 200,000 new cases per year in the US. Because of the high- risk of recurrence of typical AFL with medical therapy, catheter ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus has emerged as definitive and first-line treatment for these patients. The AFL ablation procedure is performed in about 47,000 patients per year in the US. However, it has been recognized that in many of these patients, atrial fibrillation (AF) will develop during follow-up. PVI via catheter ablation has been successfully employed for years to treat symptomatic AF. Moreover, PVI has not been used as a prophylactic intervention even in groups known to be high-risk for the future development of AF. Preliminary studies, including our pilot PREVENT AF I randomized trial, suggested that prophylactic PVI may be effective at reducing new onset AF and overall AF burden in AFL patients. Based on this pilot trial, we propose a multicenter randomized clinical trial enrolling 620 patients with paroxysmal or persistent typical AFL (with no known AF) who have been referred for a catheter ablation procedure based on conventional clinical indications and who will be randomized 1:1 to catheter ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) for AFL alone (control group) or catheter ablation of AFL plus complete PVI (experimental group ) with prespecified clinical endpoints. There is a strong premise based on several observational studies and a few small pilot trials that prophylactic PVI in patients undergoing AFL ablation for AFL is associated with a significant reduction in the risk and burden of AF in comparison to AFL ablation performed without concomitant PVI. However, data from these clinical trials are lacking in regard to whether PVI in addition to routine AFL ablation will contribute to a significant reduction in cardiac events and healthcare utilization.

No related papers found yet.