Foreign Body Ingestion
Conditions
Keywords
foreign body
Brief summary
We describe a single-center, retrospective case series (n = 10) for the utilization of dual instruments to extract foreign body at physiological narrowing. Foreign bodies that failed to remove with a single instrument or located in physiological narrowing into the duodenal bulb or descending duodenum were considered appropriate for this technique. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before the procedure.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
-Consecutive patients who underwent dual-instrument endoscopic retrieval for upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies at our center during the study period.
Exclusion criteria
-Patients with incomplete clinical or procedural records. Patients lost to follow-up immediately after the procedure.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Successful Endoscopic Foreign Body Removal Rate | 1 day | Percentage of patients in whom the foreign body is completely removed using the dual-instrument endoscopic retrieval technique without the need for surgical intervention. Success will be assessed by direct endoscopic visualization and procedural records. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure-Related Adverse Event Rate | 1 week | Percentage of patients experiencing procedure-related adverse events, including mucosal injury, bleeding, perforation, aspiration, or infection. Adverse events will be assessed based on endoscopic findings, clinical evaluation, and post-procedural medical records. |
Countries
China