Skip to content

Arthroscopic Versus Open Management of Lateral Epicondylitis Elbow (Randomized Control Trial)

Arthroscopic Versus Open Management of Lateral Epicondylitis Elbow (Randomized Control Trial)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07648849
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-06-15
Start date
2026-06-11
Completion date
2028-06-11
Last updated
2026-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tennis Elbow

Keywords

tennis elbow, lateral epicondylitis, arthroscopy

Brief summary

Arthroscopic Versus Open management of lateral epicondylitis elbow (Randomized Control Trial)

Detailed description

Currently, any indication for elbow surgery can also serve as a potential indication for arthroscopic or arthroscopically assisted management, subject to anatomical compatibility. Often, the pro¬cedure can be more effectively carried out using arthroscopy than through an open approach. The arthroscopic management of lateral epicondylitis demands a thorough understanding of the anatomy of the common extensor origin and the lateral ulnar collateral ligament as the important adjacent structure \[1,2\]. At the elbow joint, the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) lies on top of the tendinous portion of the ECRB. When performing an open procedure for lateral epicon¬dylitis, the muscular portion of the ECRL must be exposed to vi¬sualize the tendinous ECRB. The arthroscopic approach offers an advantage in debriding the ECRB without insulting the integrity of the ECRL. The diamond-shaped footprint of ECRB is located just distal to the lateral epicondyle\[3\]

Interventions

PROCEDUREArthroscopy & saline irrigation

release of lateral epicondylitis using arthroscope

PROCEDUREopen surgery

open surgical release

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* tennis elbow not responding to conservative measures (more than 6 months) adult population (more than 18 years)

Exclusion criteria

* Degenerative changes of the elbow (as inflammatory diseases) Previously operated cases Disorganized anatomy of the joint (as in posttraumatic cases) neurovascular compromise of the upper limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative elbow pain6 months postoperativepain measured according to numeric rating scale (NRS)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 16, 2026