Skip to content

Deep Learning Time-Series Prediction of Long-Term Growth Patterns of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules Using Serial CT

Development and Multi-Cohort Validation of a Deep Learning Spatiotemporal Model for Predicting Long-Term Progression of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules Using Serial Thoracic CT

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07647692
Acronym
GGN-Trajectory
Enrollment
4750
Registered
2026-06-15
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2031-06-01
Last updated
2026-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenocarcinoma of Lung, Lung Neoplasms, Pulmonary Nodules

Keywords

Ground Glass Opacity, Ground-Glass Nodule, Longitudinal CT, Time-Series Analysis, Growth Trajectory, Volume Doubling Time, Deep Learning, Radiomics

Brief summary

Pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) are commonly found on chest CT scans. Some stay stable for years, while others slowly or rapidly turn into lung cancer. Doctors currently follow these nodules with repeated CT scans, but it is difficult to tell ahead of time which nodules will progress, how fast they will progress, and which ones can be safely monitored rather than immediately treated. This observational study aims to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) model that uses each patient's series of CT scans over time to predict the long-term growth behavior of a GGN. The research team will collect three retrospective single-center cohorts from Peking University People's Hospital (a development cohort and two internal test cohorts, one from surgically resected patients and one from non-operated patients followed by serial CT) as well as a prospective multi-center validation cohort enrolled after the AI model is locked. For every patient, each GGN is automatically segmented in three dimensions on every CT scan. A deep learning model extracts imaging features at each timepoint and feeds the sequence of features, together with the actual times between scans, into a time-aware sequence model. The model is trained to predict (i) whether the nodule will show radiological progression at 1, 3, and 5 years after baseline, and (ii) which of four long-term growth patterns the nodule will follow: stable, slow progression, slow-then-rapid progression, or rapid progression. In patients who were ultimately resected, the histopathological diagnosis serves as a secondary reference standard. This is an observational study. No experimental treatment is given. All CT scans and clinical visits are part of routine clinical care.

Detailed description

Pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs), including pure ground-glass nodules (pGGN) and mixed ground-glass nodules (mGGN), span a biological spectrum from atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ to invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Current management guidelines (Fleischner Society, BTS, NCCN) rely primarily on cross-sectional CT features (diameter, density, consolidation-to-tumor ratio); these features do not capture the non-linear long-term behavior of GGNs. Long-term cohorts show that a meaningful fraction of GGNs remain indolent for years and then accelerate, demonstrating the limits of single-timepoint assessment. Existing GGN management algorithms emphasize cross-sectional features measured on a single CT scan. Cross-sectional features alone are known to lose discriminative performance at longer (3-5 year) prediction horizons, where the relevant signal is increasingly carried by how the nodule changes over time rather than how it looks at any single moment. The present study is designed around this observation. It shifts the modeling target from static single-CT classification to a long-term spatiotemporal deep-learning framework that explicitly encodes the full trajectory of the nodule across the entire available serial-CT record. This study uses a mixed retrospective-prospective design and is reported under TRIPOD guidance. Four cohorts are pre-specified: * Development Cohort (Cohort 1): n ≈ 2,700. Surgically resected patients at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2007 to June 2025, with ≥ 2 pre-operative thin-slice chest CT scans available for the resected GGN. * Internal Test Cohort A (Cohort 2): n ≈ 350. Surgically resected patients at Peking University People's Hospital from July 2025 to January 2026, with ≥ 2 pre-operative thin-slice chest CT scans available for the resected GGN. * Internal Test Cohort B (Cohort 3): n ≈ 1,200. Non-operated patients at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2025, with ≥ 3 thin-slice chest CT scans of the target GGN. * Prospective External Validation Cohort (Cohort 4): n ≈ 500. Patients (operated or non-operated) prospectively enrolled at Peking University People's Hospital and additional co-sites after the AI model is locked, with serial thin-slice chest CT performed as part of routine surveillance. This cohort serves as independent external (in-time and multi-center) validation and is not used for any model training or hyperparameter tuning. After resampling to 1 × 1 × 1 mm and lung-window normalization, serial CTs are spatiotemporally registered (rigid + deformable) to baseline. For each timepoint, two regions of interest (ROIs) are derived for every target GGN: (i) the intratumoral ROI, defined as the full 3D extent of the nodule itself, automatically segmented using a pre-trained 3D U-Net with expert review; and (ii) the peritumoral ROI, defined as the shell of lung parenchyma extending 5 mm outward from the segmented nodule boundary, with intervening vessels, airways, and pleural surfaces masked out, to capture the perinodular lung microenvironment around the nodule. Radiomic features (per the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative, IBSI) are extracted separately from each ROI, and deep features are extracted by a 3D convolutional neural network (e.g., 3D ResNet) applied independently to the intratumoral and peritumoral volumes. The two feature streams are concatenated at each timepoint to capture both intra-lesional heterogeneity and the perilesional microenvironment, which prior work from our team has shown to be informative. The ordered sequence of per-timepoint feature vectors, together with the actual inter-scan time intervals, is fed into a time-aware sequence model (LSTM, GRU, or continuous-time Transformer) to model growth dynamics. Clinical covariates (age, sex, smoking history, family history of malignancy, emphysema score) are fused into a multimodal network. Temporal-attention maps and Shapley values are used for interpretability, with separate attribution reported for the intratumoral and peritumoral feature streams. Model performance is reported with AUC and 95% CI for binary 1-, 3-, and 5-year progression endpoints, with DeLong testing against a single-baseline-CT radiomics benchmark; multi-class performance for the four-pattern trajectory task is reported with weighted / macro / micro F1 plus per-class precision and recall. Class imbalance, in particular the slow-then-rapid subgroup, is addressed with ADASYN oversampling and focal loss. For the subset of patients ultimately resected (Cohorts 1, 2, and the operated subset of Cohort 4), histopathological diagnosis serves as a secondary reference standard against which the imaging endpoints and the AI-predicted trajectory are compared.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSerial Thin-Slice Chest CT

Routine-care thin-slice non-contrast chest CT (slice thickness ≤ 1.5 mm, lung-window reconstruction) acquired at baseline and at subsequent clinical follow-up timepoints (minimum inter-scan interval \> 1 month). Images are resampled to 1 × 1 × 1 mm and intensity-normalized before analysis. No additional imaging, radiation exposure, or procedures are performed for this study; all imaging is part of routine clinical care.

Sponsors

Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years. * Persistent pulmonary ground-glass nodule (pGGN or mGGN, 5-30 mm) on thin-slice chest CT (slice thickness ≤ 1.5 mm). * Baseline and follow-up thin-slice chest CTs of sufficient quality for 3D segmentation and registration. * Minimum interval between any two consecutive CTs \> 1 month. * Complete baseline clinical data available (age, sex, smoking history, family history of malignancy, relevant comorbidities). Cohort-specific inclusion * Group 1 (Development): surgical resection of the target GGN at PKUPH between Jan 2007 - Jun 2025, with ≥ 2 pre-operative thin-slice CTs available. * Group 2 (Surgical internal test): surgical resection at PKUPH between Jul 2025 - Jan 2026, with ≥ 2 pre-operative thin-slice CTs available. * Group 3 (Non-surgical internal test): non-operative management at PKUPH between Jan 2020 - Dec 2025, with ≥ 3 thin-slice CTs of the target GGN available. * Group 4 (Prospective external validation): prospective enrollment after model lock at participating centers, baseline CT plus ≥ 2 planned routine follow-up thin-slice CTs.

Exclusion criteria

* Coexisting severe pulmonary disease that obscures evaluation of the target GGN (e.g., active pulmonary tuberculosis, severe interstitial lung disease). * Prior history of any other thoracic malignancy, or active extrathoracic malignancy under treatment within 5 years, that would confound interpretation of the target GGN. * CT image quality insufficient for registration and feature extraction (severe motion artifact, slice thickness \> 1.5 mm at any required timepoint, or extensive metallic artifact projecting over the target GGN). * Pure solid nodule with no ground-glass component. * Target GGN already received treatment (resection, ablation, or radiotherapy) prior to the baseline CT used in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiological Progression of the Target Ground-Glass Nodule at 1 Year12 months from baseline CT (± 3-month window)Radiological progression is defined as meeting either of the following on a follow-up thin-slice CT compared with the baseline CT, based on 3D automated segmentation with expert adjudication: (a) increase of the overall maximum diameter of the nodule by ≥ 2 mm; OR (b) the appearance of a new solid component, or the increase in maximum diameter of an existing solid component, by ≥ 2 mm. The solid component is defined as regions with an attenuation value greater than -300 HU. Each participant is classified as a progression event at the 1-year timepoint if either criterion is met on a CT performed within the ± 3-month window around 12 months after baseline. Applies to all four cohorts.
Radiological Progression of the Target Ground-Glass Nodule at 3 Years36 months from baseline CT (± 6-month window)Same progression definition as Primary Outcome 1, assessed on a CT performed within the ± 6-month window around 36 months after baseline. Ascertained where the available follow-up duration permits. Applies to all four cohorts.
Radiological Progression of the Target Ground-Glass Nodule at 5 Years60 months from baseline CT (± 6-month window)Same progression definition as Primary Outcome 1, assessed on a CT performed within the ± 6-month window around 60 months after baseline. Ascertained where the available follow-up duration permits. Applies to all four cohorts.
Long-Term Growth Trajectory Classification of the Target GGNAssessed across the full serial CT record, up to 60 months from baselineEach participant's target GGN is assigned, based on the full serial CT record, to exactly one of four mutually exclusive trajectory classes: (1) Stable - no progression event during follow-up; (2) Slow progression - continuous, approximately constant slow growth or slow increase of the solid component; (3) Slow-then-rapid progression - stable or minimally changing for an early period (e.g., 1-3 years) followed by abrupt acceleration (e.g., marked shortening of volume doubling time or new prominent solid component); (4) Rapid progression - aggressive growth evident early in follow-up. Classification is performed by two senior chest radiologists reading independently on the 3D automated outputs, with a third senior radiologist adjudicating disagreements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histopathological Diagnosis at Surgical ResectionAt the time of clinical surgical resection (varies by participant; up to 60 months from baseline)For participants who undergo surgical resection of the target GGN as part of routine clinical care (all participants in Group 1, all in Group 2, and the operated subset of Group 4), the histopathological diagnosis of the resected specimen is recorded from the routine clinical pathology report and used as a secondary reference standard. Diagnoses are categorized per the WHO Classification of Lung Tumors as: atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC), or other benign / non-adenocarcinoma diagnoses. Concordance between AI-predicted trajectory class and final histopathology is reported.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTHao Li
haolipkuph@pku.edu.cn13051713494
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHao Li

Peking University People's Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 16, 2026