Skip to content

Combined Effects of LIRT-BFR Therapy in Post- Stroke Patients

Combined Effects of Low Intensity Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Therapy on Upper Limb Strength, Forward Reach and Sensorimotor Function in Post-Stroke Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07646418
Enrollment
64
Registered
2026-06-12
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2026-07-05
Last updated
2026-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Balance, BFR Therapy, Low intensity Resistance Training, Muscle Strength

Brief summary

Stroke is a focal neurological deficit of sudden onset, with symptoms lasting more than 24 hours leading to consequences like impacting physical abilities, cognitive functions and emotional well-being, speech and language difficulties. Among various rehabilitation program, Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy with low intensity resistance training has shown its promising results. Blood flow restriction training, also called Kaatsu, originated in Japan. So this study aims to determine the combined effects of Low Intensity Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction Therapy on Upper Limb Strength, Forward Reach and Sensorimotor function in Post-Stroke Patients.

Detailed description

It will be a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Non-probability convenience sampling technique will be used to recruit 64 participants aged 50 to 70 years, one-month post-stroke from hospitals of Sialkot. Sealed opaque method will be used to evenly divide to either Group-BFR therapy or Group-conventional physical therapy. Group-BFR therapy will perform low-intensity resistance exercises at 40% of their 1-RM using 2 kg weights and resistance bands, cuff will be applied at proximal site of upper limb at 150-160 mmHg. Group-conventional physical therapy will perform sensorimotor exercises and strength training with 2-3 kg weights, bands and forward reaching activities. Both groups will perform their respective exercises for 40 minutes, 4 days/week, for 6 weeks. Participants will be evaluated at the baseline and post-intervention exercise program. Outcome measures include the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity function, the Functional Reach Test for forward reach, and the Action Research Arm Test for strength. Data will be analyzed using SPSS software 25. After normality testing of the data, the Paired sample t-test will be used for parametric data while Wilcoxon test will be used for non-parametric data in intragroup comparison, while for intergroup comparison, the independent t-test will be for parametric data and Mann-Whitney U test will be used for non-parametric data

Interventions

OTHERLow intensity resistance training with Blood flow restriction therapy

Low intensity resistance training with BFR in U.L Using B.P cuff at proximal site of U.L 40% of 1RM Resistance training of U.L will be performed using small weights (1-2kg) and resistance bands. Cuff pressure should be 150-160 mmHg

Upper extremity Motor skills: Reaching, Grasping Strengthening Exercises, CIMT Sensory skills: By manually exploring different objects, temperature and pressure Dull stroke through cotton, Sharp stroke through common pin, needle to retrain sensory inputs. Upper extremity Strengthening exercises Strengthening Exercises through Thera bands, 1 or 2 kg dumbels Forward Reaching exercises with stable lower extremity Reaching exercises with stable lower extremity Standing position,core engagement, Arm position controlled movement minimizing trunk and hip movement, perturbations technique to improve stability.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

investigator, an independent assessor, who is blinded to the group allocations, will be responsible for evaluating outcomes, including sensorimotor function, strength, and forward reaching distance of upper limb of post-stroke patients.

Intervention model description

Randomised Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • 50 to 70 year of age (5) * Both males and females (5) * Generalized stroke population (both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke) (9). * Post stroke patient after 1 month (5) * Barthel index scores ≥ 20 (10) * Spasticity level according to Modified Ashworth scale should be 1/+1 grade in the affected upper limb(7) * Muscle strength at grade 3 according to MMT of affected upper limb (7)

Exclusion criteria

* • People with a history of mental/cognitive illness (9) * History of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or recurrent stroke (8) * Diabetes with peripheral neuropathy (5) * Having resting blood pressure above 160/100 mmHg even after taking medications * Cardiovascular comorbidity (heart failure, unstable angina, aortic stenosis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensory Motor Function of upper LimbBaseline and post 6 weeksFugl-Meyer Assessment test for Upper extremity (FMA-UE)
Upper Extremity strengthBaseline and post 6 weeksAction Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Forward reach DistanceBaseline and post 6 weeksFunctional Reach Test (FRT)

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTImran Amjad, PhD
imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk03324390125
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAiza Yousaf, MS-OMPT

Riphah International University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 13, 2026