Skip to content

Smartwatch-Guided Secondary Prevention After Stroke

WATCH-STEP : Pilot Trial: Smartwatch-Guided Secondary Prevention After Stroke Randomized Trial of Nurse-led Program With Active vs Passive Smartwatch in Minor Stroke. A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Nurse-led Secondary Prevention and Physical Activity Program Supported by Either an Active Smartwatch (Structured Feedback) or Passive Smartwatch in Patients With Minor Stroke.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07640360
Acronym
WATCH-STEP
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-06-10
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack

Keywords

SMARTWATCH

Brief summary

After a first stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), the risk of recurrence is high in the weeks and months following the initial event. There are several modifiable risk factors that can reduce this risk, such as blood pressure, diet, physical activity, and smoking. Many stroke patients (NIHSS \< 5) have a low daily step count during the early recovery period, despite a good functional prognosis. Active smartwatches provide real-time feedback, track progress, and set personalized walking goals, thereby boosting motivation and adherence to physical activity recommendations. The combination of advice provided by nurses and active behavioral coaching supported by a smartwatch, compared to passive monitoring, could significantly increase daily step counts over a 12-week period. The results of this research will help guide future large-scale secondary prevention strategies integrating digital health and structured nursing support.

Detailed description

To meet the study's objectives, 50 patients who have recently suffered a stroke or a transient ischemic attack (TIA) (\< 30 days) will be recruited at Brest University Hospital. Participation in this study will last 12 weeks. It consists of 3 visits, described below: =\> Visit #1: Enrollment (hospital) Enrollment will take place during a routine hospital visit. The investigator will obtain the patient's written consent. Randomization will then be performed to assign the patient to a group ("active" or "passive" watch). For all patients ("active" and "passive" watch groups): * Program led by nurses, conducted as part of routine care following a recent ischemic stroke or TIA (secondary prevention). * Issuance of a smartwatch and a smartphone * Data collection (sociodemographic information, medical history, current treatments, risk factors) * Questionnaires * Clinical examination, neurological examination, and blood draw. For patients in the "passive" smartwatch group: o The smartwatch will collect data passively, without notifications. For patients in the "active" smartwatch group: * Setting daily step goals and assessing potential obstacles * Scheduling regular calls (twice a week) for the duration of the study. * Visit #2: Phone call For all patients (both "active" and "passive" watch): * Phone contact to collect data on changes in risk factors and the occurrence of events of interest (stroke, TIA, and cardiovascular events). * Questionnaires * Visit #3: End of study (hospital) The end-of-study visit will take place at the hospital during a scheduled routine care appointment: * Assessment with a nurse as part of the secondary prevention program (routine care) * Data collection (risk factors) * Questionnaires * Clinical examination, neurological examination, and blood draw * Return of the smartwatch and smartphone

Interventions

OTHERSmartwatch-Guided Secondary Prevention after Stroke

Setting daily walking goals, assessing obstacles Regular phone calls (twice a week) to review progress, adjust goals, and provide support

Sponsors

University Hospital, Brest
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

* A prospective, randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial with 1:1 allocation.. * Randomization: Computer-generated, stratified by baseline steps (\<4,000 vs ≥4,000) * Blinding: Due to the behavioral nature of the intervention, participants and nurses cannot be blinded. * Outcome assessors will remain blinded to treatment allocation. * A CONSORT flowchart will document the passage from screening → randomization → follow-up. → end of study * Baseline (B), weeks (W) 12: o Face-to-face consultation: B and W12: Nurse + Clinical study technician for all patients * W6: phone call to provide feedback and get the information * Behavior multicomponent strategies (2X/week) for the active arm (Clinical study technician watch or phone incentive/prompt)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≤ 40-75 * Patients with recent minor ischemic stroke or TIA, initial NIHSS ≤5 (\< 30 days) * mRS ≤2 before stroke and on discharge * Patient with Wifi access (for data transmission) * Able to understand smartwatch instructions * Written informed consent * Ambulatory ≥10 meters without assistance and without walking aid * Expected to live at home during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with transient neurological deficits resolving within one hour and normal brain imaging will be excluded * Not affiliated to social security * Patient under legal protection or deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision * Patient whose follow-up will be impossible * Cognitive impairment interfering with participation (e.g., MoCA \<20). * Unstable cardiac conditions preventing walking goals. * Major visual or upper limb impairment preventing use of the smartwatch. * Life expectancy \<1 year. * Already highly active (\>10,000 steps/day, or about 1.5 hours of walking). * Participation in competing interventional trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To determine whether the addition of an active smartwatch providing structured feedback to a nurse-led activity program produces a significantly greater increase in daily step count over 12 weeks compared with the same program paired with a passive smartWeek 12Difference in steps/day at 12 weeks between both arms (average of the final 14 valid days) (target Δ ≥ 1500)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate feasibility to smartwatch wearWeek 6 and Week 12Wear-time adherence at W6 and W12
To evaluate adherence to smartwatch wearWeek 6 and Week 12System Usability Scale (SUS) at W6 and W12
To evaluate acceptability of digital feedback.Week 6 and Week 12TAM (technology Acceptance Model) at W6 and W12
To assess the impact of active smartwatch feedback on sedentary time.day 1 to week 12Resting time (excluding sleep) at baseline, W6 and W12
To assess the impact of active smartwatch feedback on gait-related activity patterns.day 1 to week 12gait performance metrics (data from the smartwatch)
To assess the impact of active smartwatch feedback on blood pressure.day 1 to week 12Continuous mean SBP and DBP and time-in-range at baseline, W6 and W12
To monitor fallsday 1 to week 12Number of falls (collected continuously via the smartwatch) between baseline and W6 and between baseline and W12.
To monitor cardiovascular events (atrial fibrillation, AF),day 1 to week 12Number of cardiovascular events between baseline and W12.
To examine effects on quality of lifeday 1 to week 12Quality of life : physical and mental SF-36 auto-questionnaire scores at baseline, W6 and W12
To examine effects on risk factorsDay 1, week 6 and week 12LDL cholesterol, alcohol, tobacco, weight and waist circumference at baseline and W12
Recurrence and cardiovascular eventsday 1 to week 12Recurrent stroke or TIA or cardiovascular events at W6 and W12 and in case of alert or hospitalization
To examine effects on fatigueday 1 to week 12Fatigue : FAS and MFIS auto-questionnaires scores at baseline, W6 and W12
To examine effects on cognitionday 1 to week 12Cognition : MoCA-short score at baseline, W6 and W12
To examine effects on depressionday 1 to week 12Mood : PHQ-2 auto-questionnaire score at baseline, W6 and W12
To examine effects on sleepday 1 to week 12Sleep : efficiency and fragmentation at baseline, W6 and W12 and continuous

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTSerge TIMSIT Pr, Neurologist
serge.timsit@chu-brest.fr+33298147349

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026