Skip to content

Gastric Ultrasound for Airway Management in Emergency Patients

Airway Management Selection Based on Gastric Content and Residual Volume Assessment in Emergency Patients at RSCM: An Ultrasonography Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07640165
Enrollment
43
Registered
2026-06-10
Start date
2025-06-05
Completion date
2025-09-13
Last updated
2026-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Emergency Surgery, Gastric Residual Volume, Pulmonary Aspiration of Gastric Contents

Keywords

airway management, rapid sequence induction (RSI), gastric ultrasound, aspiration risk, emergency, point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS)

Brief summary

This prospective observational cohort study evaluates the association between gastric residual content and volume, assessed by point-of-care gastric ultrasound (PoCUS), and the choice of airway management technique (Rapid Sequence Intubation vs. non Rapid Sequence Intubation) in adult emergency surgical patients at Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo (RSCM). Aspiration risk in emergency patients is a critical concern, and this study examines whether objective ultrasonographic findings change clinical decision-making compared to traditional clinical assessment alone.

Detailed description

Emergency patients frequently have delayed gastric emptying, increasing aspiration risk during airway management. Gastric PoCUS allows non-invasive, bedside assessment of gastric content (empty, liquid, solid, or mixed) and volume. This study quantifies gastric antrum cross-sectional area (CSA) using the Perlas formula (GV = 27.0 + 14.6 × CSA - 1.28 × age) and reports whether USG findings influenced the anesthesiologist's plan (RSI or non-RSI).

Interventions

DEVICEPreoperative Gastric Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS)

Gastric antrum ultrasound performed using a low-frequency transducer (2-5 MHz; SonoSite M-Turbo or Lumify Philips) in the supine position before anesthetic induction. The antrum cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured during the relaxation phase between two peristaltic contractions, calculating cranio-caudal (CC) and antero-posterior (AP) diameters. Gastric residual volume (GRV) was calculated using the Perlas formula: GV = 27.0 + 14.6 × CSA - 1.28 × age (years). Gastric content was classified as empty, liquid, solid, or mixed. Aspiration risk was categorized as high (GRV ≥1.5 ml/kg or solid content) or low (GRV \<1.5 ml/kg or empty).

Sponsors

Indonesia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Emergency patients requiring airway management in the Emergency Operating Room * Age \>18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Morbid obesity (BMI \>40 kg/m²) * History of prior gastric or esophageal surgery * Duodenal tube in situ * Maxillofacial trauma or anticipated difficult airway * Inability to adequately visualize the gastric antrum on ultrasound

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Association between aspiration risk based on gastric ultrasound findings and airway management technique selectionAt time of pre-induction assessment (single time point, intraoperative)Proportion of patients in whom airway management technique (Rapid Sequence Intubation vs. non Rapid Sequence Intubation) was associated with aspiration risk category (high vs. low) determined by preoperative gastric Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) findings. Aspiration risk classified as high if Gastric Residual Volume (GRV) ≥1.5 ml/kg or solid gastric content; low if GRV \<1.5 ml/kg or empty stomach. Analyzed using chi-square test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Airway Management Plan After Gastric USGBefore and immediately after gastric USG, prior to anesthetic inductionComparison of airway management plan (RSI vs. non-RSI) before and after disclosure of gastric USG findings to the treating anesthesiologist. Analyzed using McNemar's paired categorical test.
Gastric Residual VolumeAt pre-induction assessmentGastric residual volume calculated using the Perlas formula: GV = 27.0 + 14.6 × CSA - 1.28 × age (years), based on antrum cross-sectional area (CSA) measured from cranio-caudal (CC) and antero-posterior (AP) diameters. Reported as mean ± SD or median (range).
Gastric Content TypeAt pre-induction assessmentProportion of patients with each gastric content category: empty, liquid only, solid, or mixed (solid and liquid), as identified by gastric PoCUS.
Fasting Duration and Its Relationship to Gastric Residual VolumeAt pre-induction assessmentFasting duration categorized as \<8 hours, 8-12 hours, or \>12 hours since last solid food intake, and its relationship to gastric residual volume and aspiration risk classification on USG.
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification as a factor in airway management decisionAt pre-induction assessmentProportion of patients in each American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (I, II, III, IV) and its association with airway management technique selection (RSI vs. non-RSI) after gastric USG, analyzed using chi-square test.
Trauma Severity Score (ISS) as a factor in airway management decisionAt pre-induction assessmentInjury Severity Score (ISS) categorized as severe (ISS ≥15) or mild-moderate (ISS \<15) and its association with airway management technique selection (RSI vs. non-RSI) after gastric USG, analyzed using chi-square test.
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score as a factor in airway management decisionAt pre-induction assessmentGCS score recorded at pre-induction assessment and its association with airway management technique selection (RSI vs. non-RSI) after gastric USG.
Presence of clinical risk factors (sepsis, shock, GERD/gastritis) as a factor in airway management decisionAt pre-induction assessmentProportion of patients with each clinical risk factor (sepsis, hemorrhagic shock, GERD/gastritis) and its association with airway management technique selection (RSI vs. non-RSI) after gastric USG, analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026