Skip to content

Flow-Controlled Versus Volume-Controlled Ventilation During Suspension Laryngoscopy

Comparison of Flow-Controlled Ventilation and Volume-Controlled Ventilation on Respiratory Mechanics During Suspension Laryngoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07639398
Enrollment
71
Registered
2026-06-10
Start date
2023-12-20
Completion date
2024-02-19
Last updated
2026-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Laryngeal Diseases

Keywords

Flow Controlled Ventilation, Volume Controlled Ventilation, Suspension Laryngoscopy, Airway Manegement, Respiratory Mechanics

Brief summary

Suspension laryngoscopy presents significant challenges for airway management due to the need to maintain adequate ventilation while providing optimal surgical exposure. Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation mode that delivers constant inspiratory and expiratory flow using a narrow-lumen, cuffed endotracheal tube, potentially improving ventilation efficiency in shared-airway surgeries. This prospective observational study aims to compare flow-controlled ventilation and conventional volume-controlled ventilation in patients undergoing elective suspension laryngoscopy. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic parameters, perioperative pulmonary function, and procedure-related complications will be evaluated to assess the feasibility and clinical performance of FCV in this surgical setting.

Detailed description

Suspension laryngoscopy is a shared-airway surgical procedure that requires optimal visualization of the operative field while maintaining adequate ventilation and oxygenation. Conventional ventilation strategies may be associated with increased airway pressures and limited surgical exposure due to the use of standard endotracheal tubes. Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a ventilation mode characterized by constant inspiratory and expiratory flow, which may offer advantages in procedures requiring a narrow airway device. This prospective, non-randomized, observational comparative study evaluates adult patients undergoing elective suspension laryngoscopy. The choice of ventilation strategy-flow-controlled ventilation or conventional volume-controlled ventilation-was based on the attending anesthesiologist's clinical preference, reflecting routine clinical practice. All patients provided written informed consent prior to participation. In both groups, standardized anesthetic management was applied, and ventilation parameters were adjusted to maintain normocapnia and adequate oxygenation. Intraoperative respiratory mechanics, including airway pressures and lung compliance, were recorded at predefined intervals. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored throughout the procedure. Pulmonary function tests were performed preoperatively and postoperatively using a portable spirometry device. Perioperative complications were documented. The primary objective of this study is to compare intraoperative respiratory mechanics between flow-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation during suspension laryngoscopy. Secondary objectives include the assessment of perioperative hemodynamic parameters, changes in pulmonary function, and procedure-related complications.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III * Scheduled for elective suspension laryngoscopy under general anesthesia * Body mass index between 18 and 40 kg/m² * Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

- Severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal disease * Inability to cooperate with pulmonary function testing * Intraoperative hemodynamic instability or oxygen desaturation (SpO₂ \<92%) * Requirement for tracheostomy during the procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak airway pressureDuring surgery with 10 minute intervalsIntraoperative peak airway pressure (cmH2O) measured at predefined time intervals during suspension laryngoscopy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory system complianceIntraoperative period during suspension laryngoscopy with 10 minute intervals.Respiratory system compliance (mL/cmH2O) measured at predefined intraoperative time intervals.
End tidal carbondioxideIntraoperative period during suspension laryngoscopy with 10 minute intervalsEnd-tidal carbon dioxide levels (mmHg) measured during suspension laryngoscopy.
Peripheral oxygen saturationIntraoperative period during suspension laryngoscopy with 10 minute intervals.Peripheral oxygen saturation (%) measured during suspension laryngoscopy.
Forced expiratory volume in one second30 minutes before surgery and 12 hours after surgeryPreoperative and postoperative forced expiratory volume in one second (liter) measured using pulmonary function testing.
Forced vital capacity30 minutes before surgery and 12 hours after surgeryPreoperative and postoperative forced vital capacity (liter) measured using pulmonary function testing.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSalih Birkan ARI, M.D.

Ankara Trainig and Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026