Skip to content

Safety And FEasibility of a Simplified Deep Sedation Protocol for Pulsed-Field Ablation

Safety And FEasibility of a Simplified Deep Sedation Protocol for Pulsed-Field Ablation

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07633548
Acronym
SAFE-PFA
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-06-08
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2026-12-12
Last updated
2026-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Deep Sedation, Pulsed-field Ablation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, pulsed-field ablation, deep sedation, patient-reported outcomes, feasibility, safety

Brief summary

The aim of the SAFE-PFA study is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a simplified deep-sedation protocol for pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcomes.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation improves symptoms and quality of life while reducing the risk of heart failure, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and cardiovascular mortality in appropriately selected patients. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an effective and safe modality for AF ablation, based on selective electroporation of atrial myocardial cells using high-intensity, rapidly delivered electrical pulses. Consequently, PFA procedures most often require general anesthesia. In France, however, access to general anesthesia is limited for multiple reasons. It is therefore important to develop deep-sedation protocols (i.e., continuous ventilation without in-room anesthesiology support) in order to make PFA accessible to a larger number of patients. Existing protocols used in some European countries rely on restricted drugs reserved for anesthesiologists (e.g., propofol). The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a simplified deep-sedation protocol based on drugs that can be administered in the electrophysiology laboratory, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcomes.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Caen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* elective PFA-based AF catheter ablation

Exclusion criteria

* Heart failure classified as NYHA III or IV, or left ventricular ejection fraction \< 40% * Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, treated or untreated * Obesity with BMI \> 35 kg/m² * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or baseline SpO₂ \< 95% * Cognitive impairment and/or psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS - French Version)3-hour post-operativeThe Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) is a tool to assess the patient's satisfaction after sedation anesthesia. The French validated version will be used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peroperative hypoventilationPeroperative and up to 2-hour postoperativeApnea \> 60 seconds with SpO2 \< 95% and/or use of bag-mask ventilation and/or conversion to mechanical ventilation (laryngeal mask or intubation).

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 9, 2026