Skip to content

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Trigger Point Injection for Chronic Thoracic Myofascial Pain

Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block Versus Trigger Point Injection (TPI) for Chronic Thoracic Myofascial Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07632820
Enrollment
76
Registered
2026-06-08
Start date
2026-08-13
Completion date
2029-08-30
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Keywords

thoracic back pain, myofascial pain, thoracic myofascial pain, Trigger point injection, Erector spinae plane block, TPI, ESP block

Brief summary

Chronic thoracic (mid-back) pain can be difficult to treat, and there is limited evidence to guide the use of injection therapies for pain arising from muscles and surrounding soft tissues. Two commonly used treatments are trigger point injections (TPI) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks, but no studies have directly compared their effectiveness for chronic thoracic myofascial pain. The purpose of this study is to compare pain relief, physical function, emotional well-being, patient satisfaction, and safety following treatment with either an ESP block or TPI. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatments. Researchers will follow participants for up to 12 weeks after the procedure and collect information through questionnaires and pain assessments.

Interventions

DRUGErector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine

Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the thoracic level corresponding to the location of maximal pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Participants will receive 5 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine per side, with bilateral injections performed when clinically indicated for bilateral thoracic pain.

DRUGTrigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine

Participants will receive ultrasound-guided trigger point injection(s) into the thoracic paraspinal musculature at the site(s) of maximal tenderness. Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5% plain bupivacaine will be injected in volumes of 1-2 mL per injection site, with a maximum total volume of 5 mL per side and up to five injection sites per laterality.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Ohio State University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Maryland, Baltimore
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18-80 years * Chronic thoracic myofascial pain lasting at least three months * Pain intensity of ≥4 on 11-point NRS * At least two of three following conditions: Focal thoracic paraspinal pain, palpable taut band, referred pain pattern with palpation

Exclusion criteria

* Thoracic radiculopathy * Cervical myelopathy with neurological deficit * Prior cervicothoracic spine surgery * Pregnancy or lactation * Contraindication to local anesthetic * Active malignancy * Fibromyalgia * BMI \>40 kg/m2 * Workers' compensation or active litigation related to thoracic pain * Acute herpes zoster or history of postherpetic neuralgia involving thoracic dermatomes * Current opioid use \>50 morphine milligram equivalents daily * Severe psychiatric or cognitive disorders, specifically history of schizophrenia, chronic psychotic disorders, dementia * History of substance use disorder * Inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scorebaseline, 6 weeksA Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain is a patient-reported item regarding the level of pain experienced and is measured on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable".

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Oswestry Disability Indexbaseline, 6 weeksOswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated 10-item questionnaire assessing functional limitations in daily activities across spinal disorders, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)baseline, 6 weeksCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom burden.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)baseline, 6 weeksThe PCS is a 13-item instrument measuring catastrophic thinking related to pain, with scores ranging from 0 to 52, and scores of 30 or higher indicating clinically significant levels of catastrophizing.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)6 weeksThe PGIC questionnaire is a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much improved." This measure provides a global assessment of treatment benefit from the patient's perspective.
Repeat Injections12 weeksThis measure will assess the number of patients requiring repeat injection(s) within 12 weeks following the index procedure. Measurement: Binary outcome (yes/no), obtained via follow-up assessment of medical record review (no patient questionnaire).
Adverse EventsDay 0 (procedure day), 6 weeksWe will assess the occurrence of procedure-related adverse events within 6 weeks following the index procedure. This will involve categorical recording of adverse events including but not limited to: injection site pain, hematoma, infection, vasovagal reaction, allergic reaction, pneumothorax, and new or worsening neurologic symptoms. All adverse events will be recorded and categorized according to severity and relatedness to the procedure.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTRyan D'Souza, MD
dsouza.ryan@mayo.edu507-284-9696
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRyan D'Souza, MD

Mayo Clinic

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026