Skip to content

Moses 2.0 vs Magneto for HoLEP - a Randomized Controlled Trial

MOSES 2.0 vs Quanta Magneto 150 Holmium Laser for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the prostate-a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07632742
Enrollment
180
Registered
2026-06-08
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2028-06-01
Last updated
2026-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Enlarged Prostate (BPH)

Keywords

HoLEP, Holmium laser

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to compare the Magneto 150 holmium laser to the current MOSES 2.0 technology to see if there is a benefit in decreased hemostasis time intraoperatively.

Detailed description

The Magneto 150 is a high-powered 150W holmium laser that offers similar pulse-modulation benefits of MOSES 2.0, which facilitates effective dissection and enucleation of the tissue plane while also offering a new first-of-its kind proprietary Magneto setting which allows for very low peak power of 500W and longer pulse duration which allows for better hemostasis.

Interventions

DEVICEMagneto 150 holmium laser

The HoLEP procedure will be performed using the Quanta Magneto 150 holmium laser

DEVICEMoses 2.0 holmium laser

The HoLEP procedure will be performed using the Moses 2.0 holmium laser

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Cook Group Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Participants will be randomized to undergo HoLEP with their surgeon using the MOSES 2.0 holmium laser or the Magneto 150 holmium laser. Participants will not know their randomization prior to procedure, but they will be able to find out at any time after the HoLEP procedure.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Undergoing HoLEP for the treatment of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms * Internet access and a device to complete postoperative questionnaires (smartphone, tablet, laptop or desktop computer)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who lack decisional capacity * Patients unable to read/speak English * Patients who are on a blood thinner (anticoagulation medication) * Patients who do not have internet access to complete postoperative surveys

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean hemostasis timeDuring surgeryOverall intraoperative hemostasis time

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean (average) enucleation timeDuring surgeryTime taken to surgically remove excess prostate tissue while leaving the shell of the prostate intact and within the body.
Total operative timeDuring surgeryTime taken from official procedure start to completion (not accounting for the time that the patient is wheeled in, prepped and out of the operating room).
Hemostasis efficiencyDuring surgeryminutes/gram (prostate tissue removed)

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAlyssa McDonald, MPH
alyssa.mcdonald@northwestern.edu312-695-8146
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPerry Xu, MD

Northwestern University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 9, 2026