Skip to content

Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica

Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica: A Randomised Control Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07632612
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-06-08
Start date
2026-06-03
Completion date
2026-09-10
Last updated
2026-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sciatica, Sciatica Pain

Brief summary

objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of both tensioner and slider neurodynamic approaches in patients suffering from sciatica. This study seeks to establish which approach is more efficacious in alleviating pain intensity, disability functional, and mobility. The results of this study will assist physical therapists in making an informed decision on the type of neurodynamic therapy for their patients.

Detailed description

Due to the increasing prevalence of sciatica and evidence based treatment options using physiotherapy that offers effective alleviation of pain and rehabilitation of function. Neurodynamic mobilization focuses on addressing neurological problems; thus, there is a need to know about the effectiveness of the different types of the technique being used. The current research is expected to contribute to the existing literature in the area of physiotherapy concerning the identification of the most effective neurodynamic technique in the case of sciatica. These findings could be helpful for medical practitioners during their work, making decisions and planning treatment. At the same time, the results of the investigation may become the basis for further research.

Interventions

OTHERSlider Neurodynamic Technique Group

will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.

OTHERTensioner Neurodynamic Technique Group

will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.

Sponsors

Ibadat International University, Islamabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with radicular pain persisting for 12 weeks to 1 year, with no acute episode in the last 4 weeks * Unilateral symptoms radiating below the buttock to thigh, knee, or lower leg * Positive Slump Test * Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test above 45° * Functional limitation during activities such as walking or lifting

Exclusion criteria

* BMI \< 20 kg/m² or \> 30 kg/m² * Previous history of spinal surgery * Presence of red flags (significant motor/sensory loss, altered reflexes, or bowel/bladder dysfunction) * Peripheral neuropathy * History of vertebral fracture or significant spinal/limb trauma * Systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular, or renal disease) * Progressive neurological deficits (motor weakness, sensory loss, reflex changes) * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityBaseline to Week 8will be measured using VAS
Functional disabilityBaseline to week 8measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hip range of motionBaseline to week 8assessed using Goniometer
Lumbar flexion Range of MotionBaseline to Week 8measured using Modified-Modified Schober Test (MMST)

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTSojla Bashir, DPT, MSPT MSK
sojlabashir@gmail.com+923008580082
CONTACTSidra Hanif, DPT, MSNMPT, PhD PT
sidra.hanif@uipt.iiui.edu.pk+923335985631

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 9, 2026