Skip to content

The Effect of Local Anesthesia on Postopanalgesia in Patients Using Head Holder

The Effect of Lidocaine Injection at Different Concentrations on Postoperative Pain in Patients Using Head Holder.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07629713
Enrollment
75
Registered
2026-06-05
Start date
2018-01-10
Completion date
2020-01-16
Last updated
2026-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain, Acute

Keywords

Pituitary adenoma, Head-holder, Local anesthesia

Brief summary

Aim:The head holder used in neurosurgery operations causes pain in patients both peroperatively and postoperatively.Severe pain-related hemodynamic changes are seen in these participants.In our study, the investigators compared the effects of two different concentrations of lidocaine on the perioperative and postoperative hemodynamic response caused by the application of the head-holder, and the pain observed in the postoperative period. Method: Ethics committee approval and participants consent were obtained. Lidocaine 0.5% in Group 1 and 1% lidocaine in Group 2 was administered subcutaneously, 3 ml to each three points, in a total of 9 ml. Postoperative analgesic efficacy and tramadol consumption amounts of different concentrations of lidocaine were compared in participants who used a head holder.

Detailed description

1% concentration of lidocaine as skin infiltration before wearing a head-holder. compared to 0.5% concentration lidocaine application, pain was controlled in the first hour of the postoperative period.

Interventions

DRUGlidocaine was administered subcutaneously at 0.5% concentration.

In Group 1, lidocaine was administered subcutaneously at 0.5% concentration.

DRUGlidocaine was administered subcutaneously at 1% concentration.

In Group 2, lidocaine was administered subcutaneously at 1% concentration.

Sponsors

Kocaeli University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA 2-3

Exclusion criteria

* ASA 4, * going to the intensive care unit in the postoperative period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The aim of this study is to compare postoperative pain levels between two groups of neurosurgery patients who underwent surgery using a head holder.5 yearsThe aim is to alter pain levels of these two operated groups at the first, third, sixth, twelfth, and twenty-fourth hours after surgery. Change from baseline in pain Scores on the Visiual Analog Scale at one day after surgery

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORDİLEK İÇLİ

PROFESSOR

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 6, 2026