Skip to content

OBE vs PBL in Physiotherapy Education

Comparison of Outcome-Based Education and Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Physiotherapy Education

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07627776
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-06-04
Start date
2026-05-04
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Education, Problem-based Learning

Brief summary

This randomized controlled educational study aims to compare the effects of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) and guided Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approaches on learning processes and learning outcomes in undergraduate physiotherapy education. Although traditional theoretical instruction is widely used in health professions education, concerns remain regarding the development of clinical reasoning, active learning, and knowledge retention. OBE and PBL represent two structured educational approaches designed to support competency-based and contextual learning. Participants are randomly assigned to either an OBE-based instructional group or a guided PBL group. Following a common theoretical foundation provided to all participants, subsequent educational content is delivered according to the assigned pedagogical approach. The study will evaluate cognitive load, motivation-related self-regulated learning skills, student satisfaction, learning experience, attendance, and knowledge retention. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of evidence-based educational strategies in physiotherapy and rehabilitation education.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled educational study is conducted among undergraduate physiotherapy students and focuses on posture-related theoretical and applied educational content. All participants initially receive a common theoretical foundation including posture, postural alignment, balance-posture relationship, and basic postural assessment approaches prior to implementation of the educational intervention strategies. Following this common instructional phase, the educational process differs according to the assigned pedagogical approach. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an Outcome-Based Education (OBE) group or a guided Problem-Based Learning (PBL) group. In the OBE group, teaching activities and assessment processes are structured according to predefined learning outcomes aligned with Bloom's revised taxonomy. In the guided PBL group, participants engage in structured case-based discussions and problem-solving activities supported by instructor guidance. Students are encouraged to analyze clinical scenarios, discuss possible solutions, and apply theoretical knowledge within contextual learning processes. The study aims to compare the effects of these educational approaches on cognitive load, motivation-related self-regulated learning skills, student satisfaction, learning experience, attendance, and knowledge retention in undergraduate physiotherapy education. Demographic and educational characteristics, including citizenship, primary language of instruction, grade point average, and previous learning experiences, will be explored as potential factors associated with learning processes and learning outcomes. Sample size was determined using an a priori power analysis.

Interventions

A guided problem-based learning (PBL) educational approach involving case-based discussions, structured problem-solving activities, and active student participation under instructor guidance.

BEHAVIORALOutcome-Based Education

An outcome-based education (OBE) approach structured according to predefined learning outcomes, aligned teaching activities, and targeted competencies.

Sponsors

Medipol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Statistical analyses will be conducted by a statistician blinded to group allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Being enrolled in the educational program in which the intervention is conducted during the study period * Actively participating in the educational activities during the study period * Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Participating in less than 70% of the educational sessions * Having missing data at a level that prevents inclusion in the data analysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive LoadBaseline and immediately after completion of the educational interventionPerceived cognitive load during the learning process will be assessed using the Paas 9-point Mental Effort Rating Scale. Scores range from 1 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher perceived mental effort.
Motivation-Related Self-Regulated Learning SkillsBaseline and immediately after completion of the educational interventionMotivation-related self-regulated learning skills will be assessed using selected subscales of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of motivation-related self-regulated learning skills.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Student Satisfaction and Learning ExperienceBaseline and immediately after completion of the educational interventionStudent satisfaction, learning experience, and perceived active participation will be evaluated using a researcher-developed 5-point Likert-type self-report questionnaire. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction, more positive learning experience, and greater perceived active participation.
Perceived Alignment With Learning OutcomesBaseline and immediately after completion of the educational interventionParticipants' perceptions regarding achievement of predefined learning outcomes will be evaluated using self-assessment items based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived achievement of learning outcomes.
Attendance RateImmediately after completion of the educational interventionAttendance rate will be calculated based on official attendance records and expressed as percentage of participation throughout the educational intervention period.
Knowledge RetentionBaseline and immediately after completion of the educational interventionKnowledge retention will be assessed using a researcher-developed 20-item multiple-choice test based on predefined learning outcomes. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knowledge retention.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSıla YILMAZ, Dr. Lect.

Medipol University

STUDY_DIRECTORGizem ERGEZEN ŞAHİN, Assoc. Prof.

Medipol University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026