Skip to content

Effects of the Tyler Twist Versus Eccentric Exercises

Effects of the Tyler Twist Versus Eccentric Exercises in Patients With Lateral Epicondylagia

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07626632
Enrollment
38
Registered
2026-06-04
Start date
2026-06-15
Completion date
2026-11-13
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Epicondylalgia

Keywords

Hand Strength, Eccentric exercise, Resistance Training, Tyler Twist

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the effects of the Tyler Twist exercise versus traditional eccentric exercises on pain, grip strength, and functional outcomes in patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylalgia. The primary objective is to determine which intervention offers greater improvement in clinical symptoms and overall function over a defined treatment period.

Detailed description

Conservative management is typically the first line of treatment, with eccentric exercises widely recognized for their effectiveness in promoting tendon healing and reducing pain. The "Tyler Twist," exercise is a variation using the TheraBand FlexBar, that has emerged as a superior potential alternative, that combines both eccentric and concentric loading in a functional and controlled way. However, direct comparative evidence between the Tyler Twist and conventional eccentric exercises has remained limited.

Interventions

* Position: * The patient holds the FlexBar in both hands. * The affected arm is placed in front with the elbow extended and wrist in slight extension. * The unaffected hand grips the other end of the FlexBar. * Twisting Motion: 1. The patient uses the unaffected hand to twist the FlexBar into a taut position while the affected hand resists the motion (eccentric loading). 2. Once the FlexBar is twisted, the patient extends the arms in front and slowly untwists the bar with the affected wrist, creating a controlled eccentric contraction. 3. Emphasis is placed on slow, controlled movement (2-3 seconds for untwist). 4. 3 sets of 15 repetitions, once daily. 5. Progress to higher resistance FlexBars as tolerated (e.g., from red to green to blue). 6. Supervision during clinical visits (twice per week), rest is home-based

OTHERTraditional Eccentric Wrist Extensor Exercises

* Position: * Patient seated with the forearm resting on a table, palm facing down, wrist hanging off the edge. * Elbow flexed to \~90 degrees. * Eccentric Movement: 0\. The patient uses the unaffected hand to assist the affected wrist into extension (starting position). 1. The affected wrist then slowly lowers the weight into flexion (eccentric contraction). 2. The cycle is repeated, focusing on slow movement (2-4 seconds lowering phase). 3. 3 sets of 10-15 reps, once daily. 4. Weight increased progressively based on pain-free performance. 5. Supervised sessions 2x/week; home exercise on other days

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ● Males and female patients suffering from lateral epicondylagia in subacute and chronic phase. * Age between 20yrs-40yrs. * Patients screened with positive Cozen's test, positive Mill's test, positive Maudsley's test \[14\]. * NPRS pain score ≥ 4 on activity. * Tenderness on palpation over the lateral epicondyle of humerus, * Pain with gripping, Pain with resisted wrist extension.

Exclusion criteria

* History of recent trauma or surgery of elbow. * Acute stage of lateral epicondylagia. * Corticosteroid injection within the last 3 months. * Neurological defeciency of the affected limb \[16\]. * Systemic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or fibromyalgia. * Diabetes mellitus (uncontrolled) due to its influence on tendinopathy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric pain rate scale (NPRS) for pain6 weeksTo determine the degree of pain that the patient will report, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will be utilized. This scale consists of 11 points ranging from 0-10, where zero indicates no pain, five represents moderate pain intensity, and ten signifies severe pain intensity
Handheld dynamometer for grip strength:6 weeksFor pain-free grip strength assessment, the patient's arm is positioned comfortably with the shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, the elbow flexed to 90 degrees.20, the forearm in a neutral position, and the wrist in slight extension and ulnar deviation. The patient is instructed to squeeze as tightly as possible for 3-5 seconds, with multiple trials and an average of three repetitions recorded. A brief pause is provided between trials to prevent muscle fatigue. Hand-held dynamometers have been shown to have excellent internal validity and reliability, with reported values of 0.31-0.69 in the upper extremities
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) for functional disability6 weeksThe PRTEE questionnaire is one of the most widely-used outcome measures that appreciates elbow

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTImran Amjad, PhD
Imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk03324390125
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHira Shaukat, Mphill

Riphah International University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026