Skip to content

CIMT Versus HABIT in Late Sub-Acute Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

Comparative Effects of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training for Upper Extremity Function in Late Sub-Acute Post-Stroke Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07626554
Acronym
CIMT-HABIT
Enrollment
34
Registered
2026-06-04
Start date
2025-06-05
Completion date
2026-08-06
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

This study will compare the effects of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training on upper extremity function in late sub-acute post-stroke patients. It will be a randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated into two groups. One group will receive Constraint Induced Movement Therapy, while the other group will receive Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training. Both groups will also receive standard physiotherapy for mobility and postural control. The intervention will continue for 3 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after the intervention using upper limb function and motor control assessment tools.

Detailed description

Stroke commonly affects upper extremity function and may reduce a patient's ability to perform daily activities independently. In the late sub-acute phase after stroke, structured rehabilitation may help improve arm and hand function, motor control, and real-world use of the affected upper limb. Constraint Induced Movement Therapy encourages use of the affected upper limb by restricting the unaffected arm and providing intensive task-oriented training. Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training focuses on coordinated use of both hands through functional bimanual tasks. This study will compare these two rehabilitation approaches in late sub-acute post-stroke patients. Findings may help guide evidence-based selection of upper limb rehabilitation strategies for improving functional recovery after stroke.

Interventions

Constraint Induced Movement Therapy will be provided for 3 weeks. The unaffected upper limb will be constrained with a mitt for 90% of waking hours. Participants will receive intensive task-oriented training of the affected upper limb for 2 hours per day, 5 days per week. Activities will include reaching, grasping, manipulating objects, dressing, and eating tasks. Standard physiotherapy for mobility and postural control will also be provided.

BEHAVIORALHand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training

Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training will be provided for 3 weeks. Participants will receive supervised bimanual upper limb training for 2 hours per day, 5 days per week. Activities will include symmetrical and asymmetrical bilateral tasks such as folding clothes, pouring water, object transfer, and coordinated hand use. Standard physiotherapy for mobility and postural control will also be provided.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome assessor will remain blinded to group allocation during baseline and post-intervention assessments.

Intervention model description

participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: Constraint Induced Movement Therapy group and Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 40 years and above. * Diagnosed with unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. * Stroke duration between 3 to 6 months. * Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 or above. * Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Severe pain in the more affected upper limb on verbal rating scale. * Spasticity greater than 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale in the affected upper limb. * Unstable cardiovascular conditions. * Any traumatic musculoskeletal injury of the upper limb.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)Baseline and Week 3 (Post-intervention)Measures motor recovery and voluntary movement of the affected upper limb after stroke.
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)Baseline and Week 3 (Post-intervention)Assesses upper extremity functional ability including grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor Activity Log (MAL)Baseline and Week 3Evaluates real-world use of the affected arm including Amount of Use and Quality of Movement.
Box and Block Test (BBT)Baseline and Week 3Assesses gross manual dexterity by counting blocks transferred within 60 seconds.
Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT)Baseline and Week 3Measures functional hand performance during simulated daily activities.
Adult Assisting Hand Assessment (Ad-AHA)Baseline and Week 3Measures effectiveness of affected hand use during bimanual task performance.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRAmbreen I IQBAL

Riphah International University Role

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026