Skip to content

Feasibility and Safety of Targeting Neutral vs Liberal Fluid Balance in Traumatic Brain Injured Patients- LIMIT-TBI Trial

Feasibility and Safety of Targeting Neutral vs Liberal Fluid Balance in Traumatic Brain Injured Patients: a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial - LIMIT-TBI Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07625995
Acronym
LIMIT-TBI
Enrollment
88
Registered
2026-06-04
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2029-02-01
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Brain Injury, Neurocritical Care, Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Fluid Balance, Fluid Therapy, Hemodynamic Management, Feasibility Study, Intracranial Pressure

Brief summary

The LIMIT-TBI trial is a multicenter, international, randomized, phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of targeting a neutral fluid balance compared to standard care in critically ill adult patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Fluid therapy is a cornerstone of TBI management, but optimal fluid balance remains uncertain, with both fluid overload and restriction potentially leading to adverse outcomes. This study aims to determine whether maintaining a daily fluid balance close to zero (±500 mL) during the first 5 days of ICU admission is achievable and safe. Participants will be randomized within 48 hours of ICU admission to either a protocolized neutral fluid balance strategy or standard care. Outcomes include feasibility of achieving the target balance, organ complications, hemodynamic parameters, ICU resource utilization, and mortality and neurological outcomes up to 6 months.

Detailed description

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide and frequently requires intensive care management. In these patients, preventing secondary brain injury is essential and involves optimizing cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), systemic hemodynamics, and organ function. Fluid therapy plays a central role in achieving these goals. However, the optimal fluid management strategy in TBI remains unclear. Excessive fluid administration may lead to complications such as pulmonary edema and worsening cerebral edema, while restrictive strategies may increase the risk of hypovolemia and impaired cerebral perfusion. Current guidelines provide limited or no specific recommendations due to the lack of high-quality randomized evidence. Observational data suggest that a more positive fluid balance is associated with worse outcomes, but causality has not been established. The LIMIT-TBI trial is a pragmatic, international, multicenter, randomized, unblinded, parallel-group phase II study designed to address this evidence gap. Adult patients with TBI admitted to the ICU will be randomized within 48 hours in a 1:1 ratio to either: A neutral fluid balance strategy, targeting a daily balance of 0 mL (±500 mL) and cumulative neutrality over the first 5 days, using a protocolized approach combining fluid restriction, vasopressors, and diuretics when needed; A standard of care strategy, in which fluid administration is guided by local practice and clinician judgment. In the intervention group, all fluid inputs (intravenous fluids, medications, and enteral nutrition) and outputs are strictly monitored. Maintenance fluids are minimized, and adjustments are made daily to achieve neutrality while maintaining adequate mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility and safety of achieving a neutral fluid balance, defined as maintaining a daily balance within ±500 mL. Secondary outcomes include systemic complications, hemodynamic parameters (including CPP), fluid administration metrics, vasopressor and diuretic use, organ support-free days, and ICU/hospital mortality. Long-term outcomes include 6-month mortality and neurological status assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE). A total of 88 patients will be enrolled to provide adequate power to detect differences in fluid balance between groups. Statistical analyses will include linear mixed models for repeated measures and appropriate comparative tests for secondary outcomes, with multiple imputation for missing primary endpoint data. This trial will provide important preliminary randomized evidence on fluid management in TBI and inform the design of future large-scale trials aimed at improving outcomes in this high-risk population.

Interventions

OTHERNeutral Fluid Balance Strategy

Protocolized strategy targeting a daily fluid balance of 0 ± 500 mL for 5 days using restricted fluids, diuretics, and vasopressors to maintain hemodynamic and cerebral perfusion targets.

Sponsors

Erasme University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
CollaboratorOTHER
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Erasmus University Rotterdam
CollaboratorOTHER
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Restrictive Fluid Management Strategy (INTERVENTION) vs. Routine Fluid Management Strategy (CONTROL)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with traumatic brain injury (isolated or associated with extracranial injuries), with or without intracranial pressure monitoring * Admission to the intensive care unit * Age \>18 years * Enrollment within 48 hours after ICU admission

Exclusion criteria

* Enrollment in another clinical trial not approved for co-enrollment * Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy * Concomitant hemorrhagic shock expected to require surgical treatment within 24 hours from inclusion or requiring massive transfusion protocol * Hemodynamic instability at ICU admission, defined as heart rate \>120 beats/min and systolic arterial pressure \<100 mmHg despite at least 1 L of fluid resuscitation, or requirement for high-dose norepinephrine (\>0.5 mcg/kg/min) or any inotropic support * Need for continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at admission * Expected survival \<48 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of achieving a neutral daily fluid balanceAt 5 days after randomisationProportion of patients achieving a mean daily fluid balance within 0 ± 500 mL during the 5 days after ICU admission - mean daily fluid balance will be measured at day 5 as the mean of the fluid balances of the 5 previous days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of systemic organ complicationsICU dischargeIncidence of new organ dysfunction or complications during ICU stay.
Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)From randomisation to day 5 after randomisationMean and daily cerebral perfusion pressure during ICU stay.
Daily fluid balance and fluid inputFrom randomisation to day 5 after randomisationMean daily fluid balance and total fluid input during the first 5 days
Vasopressor and diuretic useICU dischargeTotal and daily dose of vasopressors and diuretics during ICU stay.
Vasopressor-free daysFrom randomisation to day 28 after randomisationNumber of days alive and free from vasopressor support.
Ventilator-free daysFrom randomisation to day 28 after randomisationNumber of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation.
Therapy intensity level (TIL)At day 5 after randomisationMaximum therapy intensity level during the intervention period.
ICU and hospital mortalityHospital dischargeAll-cause mortality during ICU and hospital stay.
Neurological outcome (GOSE)Hospital dischargeFunctional neurological outcome assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended.
Long-term mortality180 days after randomizationAll-cause mortality at follow-up.
Long-term neurological outcome (GOSE)180 days after randomizationFunctional neurological outcome assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended. Scale 1 to 8, 1= dead; 8=good recovery no social and mental deficits

Countries

Belgium, Italy

Contacts

CONTACTFabio Silvio Taccone, MD, PhD
fabio.taccone@hubruxelles.be+32 2 555 33 95

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026