Skip to content

Effects of a Five-Dimensional Intervention Program Based on Inner Strength on Demoralization Syndrome in Elderly Cancer Patients

Effects of a Five-Dimensional Intervention Program Based on Inner Strength on Demoralization Syndrome in Elderly Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07625904
Enrollment
66
Registered
2026-06-04
Start date
2025-07-04
Completion date
2025-12-12
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Demoralization

Brief summary

From January 2025 to January 2026, a total of 66 elderly cancer patients with demoralization syndrome who were hospitalized in the Department of Internal Medicine at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. Participants were allocated randomly to either a control group (CG, n = 33) or an intervention group (IG, n = 33) utilizing a random number table in combination with the ward-floor allocation method. The CG received routine oncology nursing care, whereas the IG received a one-month, five-dimensional intervention program based on inner strength in addition to standard care. Outcomes were assessed utilizing the Chinese versions of Demoralization Scale, Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Inner Strength Scale, and Self-Efficacy Scale.

Interventions

OTHERpsychological support

From January 2025 to January 2026, a total of 66 elderly cancer patients with demoralization syndrome who were hospitalized in the Department of Internal Medicine at our hospital were enrolled. Participants were allocated randomly to either a control group (CG, n = 33) or an intervention group (IG, n = 33) utilizing a random number table in combination with the ward-floor allocation method. The CG received routine oncology nursing care, whereas the IG received a one-month, five-dimensional intervention program based on inner strength in addition to standard care. Outcomes were assessed utilizing the Chinese versions of Demoralization Scale, Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Inner Strength Scale, and Self-Efficacy Scale.

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 60 years * Diagnosis of a malignant tumor confirmed by pathological biopsy or imaging, in accordance with the Diagnosis and Treatment Specifications for Malignant Tumors * Fulfillment of the diagnostic criteria for demoralization syndrome, described as a score \> 30 on the Chinese version of the Demoralization Scale (DS) * Clear consciousness, with the capability to communicate effectively or complete questionnaires, and no evidence of cognitive impairment * Voluntary participation with signed informed consent * Expected survival ≥ 3 months, without vital organs' severe dysfunction, including the liver, kidneys, or heart

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of psychiatric disorders, severe cognitive impairment, aphasia, or other conditions that would interfere with participation in the intervention or assessments * Severe complications, cachexia, or rapidly progressing disease * Receipt of psychological interventions or psychotropic medications within the previous month * Transfer to another hospital, withdrawal from the study, or loss to follow-up during the study period * A history of alcohol or drug dependence

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Chinese version of the Disappointment Scaleone month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
self-rating anxiety scaleone month
Depression Self-Rating Scaleone month
Chinese Version of the Inner Strength Scaleone month
Self-Efficacy Scaleone month

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026