Skip to content

Frailty in the Elderly Oncological and Oncohematological Patient.

Impatto Della Diagnosi di fragilità Sulla tossicità da Terapia in Pazienti Anziani Affetti da Tumore oncoLogIco e onCoEmatologico.

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07624370
Acronym
SALICE
Enrollment
160
Registered
2026-06-03
Start date
2025-03-21
Completion date
2028-12-13
Last updated
2026-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty/Sarcopenia, Hematologic Disease, Oncological Patients, Sarcopenia in Elderly

Brief summary

The Italian population is progressively aging, and cancer incidence increases with age. Older patients are at higher risk of frailty, a condition associated with adverse outcomes such as disability, falls, hospitalization, and mortality. Key indicators of frailty include reduced balance, impaired physical activity, cognitive decline, and particularly sarcopenia, defined as the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. After age 60, muscle mass decreases by 1.4-2.5% annually, while muscle strength declines by 15% between ages 60-70 and by up to 30% per decade thereafter. Sarcopenia increases the risk of falls, fractures, hospitalization, and non-cancer-related death. In cancer patients, its prevalence ranges from 11% to 74% and is associated with poorer survival outcomes in both early and advanced disease stages.In clinical oncology practice, several tools are available to assess frailty, identify vulnerable patients, and personalize care, treatment, and supportive interventions.

Interventions

Evaluation of the frailty impact on the toxicity grade 3-4 in patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment.

Sponsors

Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Ovest Milanese, Ospedale di Legnano
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for patients with solid tumors: * Cytological or histological diagnosis of lung cancer or gastrointestinal tract tumors (esophageal, gastric, intestinal, colorectal, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers), mesothelioma. * Age ≥ 70 years * Patients deemed eligible, at the investigator's discretion, for first-line treatment including at least one chemotherapeutic agent * Previous treatments (e.g., adjuvant therapy) are allowed if completed at least one year prior to randomization * ECOG performance status 0, 1, or 2 * Written informed consent obtained Inclusion criteria for patients with hematologic malignancies: * Cytological or histological diagnosis of multiple myeloma or lymphoma * Age ≥ 70 years * Patients deemed eligible, at the investigator's discretion, for first-line systemic treatment * ECOG performance status 0, 1, 2, or 3 * Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Brain metastases (in solid tumors) * Symptomatic bone lesions (in solid tumors) * Cardiac disease classified as NYHA class III or IV * Current or prior prostate or breast cancer receiving hormonal therapy (GnRH agonists or antagonists, androgen inhibitors, estrogen inhibitors) * Acute leukemia * Patients with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of frailty on grade 3-4 Chemotherapy Toxicity in Patients with Solid and Hematologic Malignancies.12 months from screeningEvaluation of the impact of frailty on the probability of grade 3 or 4 toxicity in patients with solid or hematologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Multidimensional geriatric assessment including: G8 (0-17): ≤14 = frail/vulnerable; \>14 = normal. IADL (0-8): higher scores indicate greater independence. CCI: 0-2 = low comorbidity; ≥3 = high comorbidity burden. SPPB (0-12): 10-12 = good, 7-9 = intermediate, ≤6 = poor physical performance. MUST: 0 = low, 1 = medium, ≥2 = high risk of malnutrition. Mini-Cog (0-5): ≥3 = normal cognition; \<3 = cognitive impairment. CARG: low, intermediate, or high risk of severe chemotherapy toxicity. MNA: ≥24 = normal; 17-23.5 = at risk of malnutrition; \<17 = malnourished. Laboratory tests: routine pre-chemotherapy assessments according to institutional standards. BIA: evaluation of body composition, muscle mass, and phase angle. CT/MRI: assessment of muscle area at L3/L4; sarcopenia defined as \<4.8 cm²/m² in women and \<6.6 cm²/m² in men

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Identification of Sarcopenia and Frailty through Clinical Assessment12 months from the screeningAgreement between CT/MRI and BIA for sarcopenia diagnosis and association with geriatric and laboratory parameters. G8 (0-17): ≤14 = frail/vulnerable; \>14 = normal. IADL (0-8): higher scores indicate greater independence. CCI: 0-2 = low comorbidity; ≥3 = high comorbidity burden. SPPB (0-12): 10-12 = good, 7-9 = intermediate, ≤6 = poor physical performance. MUST: 0 = low, 1 = medium, ≥2 = high risk of malnutrition. Mini-Cog (0-5): ≥3 = normal cognition; \<3 = cognitive impairment. CARG: low, intermediate, or high risk of severe chemotherapy toxicity. MNA: ≥24 = normal; 17-23.5 = at risk of malnutrition; \<17 = malnourished. Laboratory tests: routine pre-chemotherapy assessments according to institutional standards. BIA: evaluation of body composition, muscle mass, and phase angle. CT/MRI: assessment of muscle area at L3/L4; sarcopenia defined as \<4.8 cm²/m² in women and \<6.6 cm²/m² in men.
Correlation of Radiological, Functional, Clinical, and Laboratory Assessments in the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia and Frailty12 months from screeningEvaluation of the concordance between sarcopenia diagnosed through radiological imaging (CT/MRI) and that obtained through a functional assessment (bioelectrical impedance analysis), the correlation between instrumental assessments and clinical parameters (comprehensive geriatric assessment) for the diagnosis of sarcopenia/frailty, and the correlation between laboratory values and clinical-instrumental measures.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 9, 2026