Skip to content

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Hydrus and iStent Combined With Phacoemulsyfication in Open Angle Glaucoma Patients Long-Term Follow-Up

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Hydrus and iStent Combined With Phacoemulsyfication in Open Angle Glaucoma Patients Long-Term Follow-Up

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07623434
Enrollment
65
Registered
2026-06-03
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2026-05-22
Last updated
2026-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Keywords

Glaucoma, iStent, Hydrus, microinvasive glaucoma surgery

Brief summary

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Hydrus and iStent combined with Phacoemulsyfication in Open Angle Glaucoma Patients a Long-Term Follow-Up

Detailed description

Purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two micro-invasive glaucoma surgery devices: Hydrus Microstent and iStent Trabecular Bypass in combination with cataract phacoemulsification in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. We additionally analyze the impact of preoperative factors on achieving surgical success in both surgical methods.

Interventions

DEVICEHydrus combined with the phacoemulsification cataract procedure

Cataract phacoemulsification with implantation of an artificial posterior chamber lens insertion into the capsular bag was first performed and subsequently the implantation of the Hydrus microscent was undertaken using a direct gonioscope lens. The injector ended with a cannula with a Hydrus microimplant was introduced through the same temporal incision that was used during the cataract stage.

DEVICEiStent with the phacoemulsification cataract procedure

Cataract phacoemulsification with implantation of an artificial posterior chamber lens insertion into the capsular bag was first performed and subsequently the implantation of the iStent implantation a 23 gauge applicator was used. iStent was gently advanced through the tra-becular meshwork and placed in the Schelmm's Canal in the inferior nasal position (3:00 to 4:00 hours in the right eye, 8:00 to 9:00 hours in the left eye).

Sponsors

Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A prospective non-randomized comparative study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

the cataract which had a significant effect on the visual acuity of the patients and one of the following conditions: progression of glaucoma in visual field confirmed by two consecutive examinations by the Humphrey visual field analyzer with SITA Standard 24-2 algorithm in the course of primary open-angle glaucoma despite the use of IOP-lowering medications (1 to 4 active ingredients) or patients not tolerating or adhering to the treatment.

Exclusion criteria

lack of consent for study participation, narrow-angle or closed-angle glaucoma, secondary glaucoma (including the course of psudoexfoliation syndrome, pigmentary glaucoma), advanced glaucoma, severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy, cloudy cornea, advanced macular degeneration, history of glaucoma surgical interventions (as well as trabeculoplasty), and use of more than four IOP-lowering medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IOP10 yearsIntraocular Pressure
BCVA10 yearsThe change of best- corrected visual acuity
Medications10 yearsMedian number of patients who took medications before surgery and up until the end of the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CCT10 yearsCentral corneal thickness
Visual Field10 yearsVisual Field of the mean defect

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 4, 2026