Skip to content

Effectiveness of Two Different Desensitizing Dental Varnishes

Effectiveness of Two Different Desensitizing Dental Varnishes: A Prospective, Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Investigation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07622043
Enrollment
66
Registered
2026-06-02
Start date
2026-07-13
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentin Desensitizing Agents, Dentin Hypersensitivity

Brief summary

Dental varnishes are commonly used to relieve dentin hypersensitivity by forming a protective film that occludes dentinal tubules and reduces fluid flow. This clinical investigation aims to compare the desensitizing effect of a fluoride containing varnish with a fluoride free placebo varnish. Primary and secondary objectives include evaluating short and long term reductions in dentinal hypersensitivity, assessing patient reported outcomes and daily experiences, and monitoring the varnish's tolerability and safety.

Interventions

DEVICEFluoride-containing varnish

A fluoride-containing varnish is applied to a tooth that is hypersensitive.

DEVICEFluoride-free varnish

A fluoride-free varnish is applied to a tooth that is hypersensitive.

Sponsors

Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

split-mouth design: 2 hypersensitive teeth are treated per participant (test and control treatment in the same patient)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed Consent signed by the subject * Age: 18-65 years * Hypersensitivity assessment scale ≥ Grade 2 in * two non-neighboring teeth in different quadrants * The affected teeth are/have: vital, caries-free, received no restorations within the last month * No change in medication anticipated over the next 3 months (e.g. due to upcoming surgery etc.)

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications and limitations of the MD as described in the instructions for use. * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to the device material (especially acrylates, mint flavouring) * Pregnant or other vulnerable subjects * Participants with severe systemic disease * Enrolment of employees of the dental clinic of Ivoclar Vivadent AG * Recent change in medication concerning Analgesics, NSAIDs, psychotropic drugs, other medications that may alter pain perception * Intake of analgesics prior to appointment * Professional desensitizing therapy in the last 3 months * Bleaching procedures in the last 4 weeks * Confounding dental conditions at test sites: defective or extensive restorations, abutment teeth for prostheses, recent restorations, pulpitis/periapical pathology. * Current or recent use of desensitizing toothpastes or mouthrinses (i.e. products specifically marketed for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity) within 4 weeks prior to enrolment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of dentin hypersensitivity1 weekassessed by patient response to an air stimulus using a pain scale (grades 0-4, lower scores mean a better outcome)

Countries

Liechtenstein

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026