Skip to content

People With Osteoporosis Can Walk-BEST to Reduce Fall and Fracture Risk

People With Osteoporosis Can Walk-BEST to Reduce Fall and Fracture Risk

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07621679
Acronym
Walk-BEST
Enrollment
28
Registered
2026-06-02
Start date
2026-05-07
Completion date
2027-05-01
Last updated
2026-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Keywords

Gait, Wearable, Walking, Falls, Fracture Risk

Brief summary

The aim of the Walk BEST study is to provide evidence that it is feasible to implement the technology assisted gait- focused walking program Walk-BEST™ in older adults with osteoporosis, and that this program is acceptable to this population.

Detailed description

The Walk-BEST™ technology assisted gait optimization program has demonstrated effectiveness in improving gait pattern and walking capacity without adverse events in people living with Parkinson's and Multiple Sclerosis. What is not known and the topic of this pilot and feasibility study is whether older people with osteoporosis will engage successfully with this program, since they do not have a diagnosis of a disabling condition affecting gait and may be unaware that their cautious method of walking exposes them to higher risk of falls and fractures rather than protecting them. A randomized pilot and feasibility study (PAFS) will be conducted with groups randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be randomly assigned to either 1) immediate receipt of the Walk-BEST™ program; or 2) wait-list control and delayed receipt of Walk-BEST™ program 3 months post-randomization. Participants will receive a copy of a proprietary workbook with instructions on simple exercises targeting strength, flexibility, and balance to facilitate a better walking pattern, as well as both 3-5 remote sessions with an exercise professional to practice walking well and to learn how to use the Heel2ToeTM sensor, and two technology phone calls with a research team member, over the first 4 weeks of the intervention. This personal gait training period will be followed by independent home practice over 2 months, during which participants will be instructed to practice walking with the sensor for a minimum period of 6 min, twice a day and to complete three exercises from their workbook at least twice a week. There will be three on-site study visits at 3-month intervals: one for initial assessment, and two for reassessment.

Interventions

DEVICEDevice: Heel2Toe[TM] sensor

Heel2Toe is a new generation of wearables that provides real-time auditory feedback when the person takes a good step, one in which the step is initiated with a strong heel strike.

BEHAVIORALTechnology-assisted therapeutic walking program

Co-designed, evidence-based technology-assisted, therapeutic walking program developed by physiotherapy researchers, clinicians, and frail and non-frail seniors. It consists of training elements (derived through international consensus and endorsed by 600 older Canadians) for optimal gait pattern with the use of a biofeedback device, the Heel2Toe™ sensor, which is introduced to reinforce the gait optimizing training and encourage home practice.

Sponsors

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

All participants eventually receive the intervention. The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes. Gait quality is measured directly from the sensor and is not affected by observers.

Intervention model description

Waist-List Control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* men and women 70 years and older * able to walk independently with or without a walking aid * experienced a prior fracture after the age of 40, OR two falls in the past 12 months, OR who have a bone mineral density test (done as part of routine clinical evaluation) with a T-score \< -2.5, OR on a Health Canada-approved anti-osteoporosis medication (oral or intravenous bisphosphonate, denosumab, teriparatide, or romozosumab) to reduce fracture risk or on a bisphosphonate drug holiday (planned treatment interruption)

Exclusion criteria

* fracture sustained in the past 12 months * unable to walk unsupervised because of active medical or neurocognitive reasons * unable to provide informed consent, or cannot communicate in English or French

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Study recruitment rates (feasibility objective)3 monthsThe study will be considered feasible if the investigator can recruit 28 participants
Study retention rates (feasibility objective)9 monthsThe study will be considered feasible if ≥ 75 % of the sample completes the final assessment
Adherence to intervention (feasibility objective)9 monthsThe intervention will be considered feasible if participants complete ≥ 65% of the prescribed number of walking sessions at the 6-month follow-up.
Perceived acceptability and usability of the Heel2Toe sensor (feasibility objective)9 monthsThe acceptability outcomes will be based on an exit debriefing questionnaire. Usability of the Heel2Toe sensor will be quantified with items from the Digital Health Devices Usability Indicators.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional walking capacityChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 monthsSix Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Grip strengthChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 monthsHand Dynamometer
BalanceChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 monthsMini-Best Test (0-28; higher is better)
Functional leg muscle strengthChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months30-second Chair stand test
Fear of fallingChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 months6-Item Revised Fear of Falling Questionnaire (6-24, lower is better)
Physical activityChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 monthsPhysical Activity Scale for the elderly (0-400+; higher is better)
Lower limb functionChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 monthsLower Extremity Functional Scale (0-80; higher is better)
Quality of LifeChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 monthsOlder Persons Active Living Related Quality of Life (8-32, higher is better)
FallsChange from Baseline to 3 months, 6 monthsNumber of falls reported in the falls calendar

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTVelizara Garkova, MSc
velizara.garkova@rimuhc.ca514-934-1934
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSuzanne Morin, MD

RI-MUHC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 3, 2026