Skip to content

Deep Sedation vs. General Anesthesia for Pulsed Field Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

A Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Deep Sedation With Dexmedetomidine Combined With Remimazolam and Remifentanil Versus General Anaesthesia for Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07621432
Acronym
SAFE-PFA
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-06-02
Start date
2026-05-25
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2026-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, pulse field ablation, deep sedation, general anesthesia, Catheter ablation

Brief summary

1. Research Title: A Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Deep Sedation With Dexmedetomidine Combined With Remimazolam and Remifentanil Versus General Anaesthesia for Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation 2. Research Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of deep sedation using a combination of dexmedetomidine and remimazolam versus remifentanil, and general anaesthesia, in patients undergoing pulsed electric field ablation for atrial fibrillation. Through this study, we hope to optimise the management of the perioperative period for atrial fibrillation pulse field ablation and develop a carefully designed deep sedation protocol based on modern pharmacology. This protocol will maximise patient comfort, facilitate the surgeon's procedure, and enhance the efficiency of overall healthcare resource utilisation, whilst ensuring surgical success and patient safety. Consequently, it will provide crucial anaesthetic support for the standardisation and widespread adoption of atrial fibrillation pulse field ablation technology. 3. Study Design: Interventional clinical study 4. Study Subjects: Patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for catheter ablation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2026 and January 2027. 5. Sample Size: N=80 patients, randomly assigned using a computer-generated random number table to the deep sedation group (n=40) or general anesthesia group (n=40) at a 1:1 ratio. 6. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: ① Age 18-75 years (inclusive); ② Clinically diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, indicated for pulse field ablation, and scheduled for catheter ablation; ③ Voluntarily agrees to participate in the trial and has signed informed consent; ④ Willing to comply with the trial requirements and complete the required follow-up. Exclusion Criteria: ① Left atrial diameter \> 55 mm; ② Transesophageal echocardiography indicates a thrombus in the left atrium; ③ Contraindications to anticoagulation 7. Observational Indicators:(1) Baseline Data: Age, sex, BMI, type of atrial fibrillation, CHA2DS2-VASc score, hemoglobin, left atrial diameter, ejection fraction, and the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, stroke/TIA, coronary heart disease and renal impairment.(2) Surgical Data: Duration of interventional procedures, X-ray exposure, operating theatre occupancy time, success rate of acute PVI, calibration deviation rate, incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain, and postoperative complications. 8. Statistical Analysis: Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software; continuous variables following a normal distribution are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and comparisons between two independent samples were performed using t-tests; categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages, and comparisons were performed using chi-square tests; a two-sided P-value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandardized Deep Sedation Protocol

A deep sedation protocol using dexmedetomidine, remifentanil and remazolam for atrial fibrillation pulse field ablation

Atrial fibrillation pulse filed ablation using a standard endotracheal intubation general anaesthesia protocol

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 75 years, inclusive * Clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation * Indicated for pulsed field ablation and scheduled for pulsed field ablation catheter procedure * Able and willing to provide written informed consent * Willing to comply with study procedures and follow-up requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Left atrial diameter \>55 mm * Presence of left atrial thrombus detected by transesophageal echocardiography * Contraindications to anticoagulation therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operating Room Occupancy TimeFrom Operating Room entry to Operating Room exitThe duration from the patient's entry into the operating room to their departure from the room. This includes anesthetic induction, the surgical procedure, and emergence/extubation.
Net Procedure DurationDuring the procedureDefined as the time from the first skin puncture for vascular access to the removal of the last catheter.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative Recovery TimeFrom procedure completion to transfer to the general ward, assessed up to 24 hours post-procedureThe time interval from the end of the procedure until the patient meets the criteria for transfer back to the general ward
Acute Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) Success RateAt the end of the ablation procedureThe percentage of pulmonary veins successfully isolated using pulsed field ablation (PFA) as confirmed by the electrophysiological mapping system.
Incidence of HypoxemiaPeriprocedural periodPercentage of patients experiencing oxygen saturation (SpO2) \< 90% requiring intervention (e.g., increasing oxygen flow or airway maneuvers).
Incidence of HypotensionPeriprocedural periodPercentage of patients experiencing at least one episode of hypotension during the procedure. Hypotension is defined as a Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg or a decrease of more than 20% from the baseline value, requiring clinical intervention (such as fluid bolus or administration of vasopressors like phenylephrine or ephedrine).
Patient Pain Intensity (NRS Score)2 hours and 24 hours post-operationPatient-reported pain levels assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable).
Total Fluoroscopy Dose (DAP)At the end of the procedureThe cumulative radiation exposure to the patient, measured as Dose Area Product (DAP) in cGy·cm².
Incidence of Perioperative Complicationsup to 30 days post-procedureOccurrence of procedure-related adverse events, including cardiac tamponade, stroke/TIA, vascular access site complications (e.g., hematoma, pseudoaneurysm), phrenic nerve injury, and anesthesia-related complications.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 3, 2026