Skip to content

Alexis O-Ring and Charnley Retrievers and Its Effect on Contamination on Total Hip Arthroplasty

Alexis O-Ring and Charnley Retrievers in Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery. Is There Any Difference in Intraoperative Contamination Rates?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07621250
Enrollment
144
Registered
2026-06-02
Start date
2024-04-20
Completion date
2026-03-10
Last updated
2026-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)

Brief summary

Randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical trial comparing two static wound retractors - the Charnley retractor and the Alexis O-Ring retractor - in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary objective is to compare surgical site contamination rates between the two devices. Secondary objectives include comparison of incision length, surgical time, intraoperative skin lesions, and postoperative complications including periprosthetic joint infection. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either retractor group. Surgical site contamination will be assessed through four intraoperative cultures taken at standardized timepoints. Follow-up will be conducted at 1 month postoperatively.

Interventions

Circular polyurethane wound retractor (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA). A rigid deep ring is placed beneath the fascia lata, and the polyurethane cylinder is rolled around the outer ring to retract wound edges and create a physical barrier between the skin and the surgical field.

DEVICECharnley Retractor

Semi-rigid stainless steel ortostatic retractor consisting of a bow with two blades (one fixed, one adjustable). Placed around the incision at the level of the fascia lata to retract wound edges through elastic tension. Standard retractor currently used in total hip arthroplasty.

Sponsors

Hospital del Mar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis indicated for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous surgical interventions or scar tissue over the hip to be operated Subcapital femoral fractures requiring THA (non-primary indication) History of infection in any previous joint arthroplasty procedure Immunological disorders increasing the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (diagnosed immunodeficiencies, chemotherapy or immunosuppressive treatment) Advanced dementia or severe cognitive impairment precluding informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical site contamination rateIntraoperativeIntraoperative surgical site contamination assessed through four standardized cultures: (1) subcutaneous tissue immediately after incision, (2) deep tissue (joint capsule) before arthrotomy, (3) deep tissue after placement of definitive prosthetic components, and (4) subcutaneous tissue after retractor removal.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 3, 2026