Skip to content

Real-World Study of Woven EndoBridge for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment

A Real-World Study of Intrasaccular Flow Disruption Devices for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07620626
Acronym
WEB-RWS
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2026-06-02
Start date
2026-06-10
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2026-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intracranial Aneurysm

Keywords

Woven EndoBridge, WEB Device, Intrasaccular Flow Disruption, Endovascular Treatment, Intracranial Aneurysm, Aneurysm Embolization, Real-World Study, Post-Market Study, Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification, WEB Occlusion Scale, Active surveillance

Brief summary

We designed the Real-World Study of Woven EndoBridge for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment (WEB-RWS), an ambidirectional, multicenter, post-market real-world study with a prospective active surveillance component. The study will include patients with IAs treated with commercially available WEB devices under the direction of treating physicians in routine clinical practice. Clinical, procedural, imaging, and safety data will be collected using a standardized electronic data capture system, with safety events adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee and imaging outcomes assessed by an independent core laboratory. The primary objective is to evaluate 12-month adequate aneurysm occlusion and major adverse events after WEB treatment. The study is expected to provide comprehensive post-market evidence on the real-world performance of the WEB device in China, including its safety, effectiveness, clinical appropriateness, and health economic value in routine neurointerventional practice.

Detailed description

Intracranial aneurysms are abnormal dilatations of blood vessels in the brain. If an aneurysm ruptures, it can cause subarachnoid hemorrhage, which may lead to serious disability or death. Endovascular treatment has become an important treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an intrasaccular flow disruption device designed to treat selected intracranial aneurysms from within the aneurysm sac. This study is a post-market, ambispective, multicenter, real-world registry study. It will evaluate the safety and performance of commercially available MicroVention WEB devices when used by treating physicians according to routine clinical practice and the approved instructions for use. The study does not assign participants to a treatment group and does not require a randomized comparison. Treatment decisions are made by the treating physicians based on standard medical care. The study plans to enroll up to 1,000 patients from multiple study centers in China. Approximately 200 patients will be included retrospectively, and approximately 800 patients will be included prospectively. Eligible participants are patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with a commercially available WEB device. For the prospective cohort, written informed consent will be obtained from the participant or legally authorized representative before study-related data collection, as applicable. Clinical data will be collected using an electronic data capture system. Imaging data will be de-identified and submitted for independent core laboratory assessment. Follow-up assessments are planned after the procedure and at approximately 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months. Follow-up may include neurological assessment, imaging evaluation, information on aneurysm retreatment, adverse event assessment, serious adverse event assessment, and information on antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication use. The primary effectiveness outcome is the proportion of aneurysms with adequate occlusion at 12 months, based on the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification. Adequate occlusion is defined as Raymond-Roy class I or II. The primary safety outcome is the rate of major adverse events, including unexpected death or major stroke within 30 days after the procedure, and neurological death or major stroke from 31 days to 1 year after the procedure. Other outcomes include aneurysm occlusion based on the WEB Occlusion Scale, aneurysm recurrence, aneurysm retreatment, rebleeding, parent artery patency, clinical outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale, device-related serious adverse events, procedure-related serious adverse events, neurological events, successful device implantation and health economic outcomes. The study will mainly use descriptive statistical methods to summarize outcomes and confidence intervals.

Interventions

DEVICEIntrasaccular Flow Disruption Device

The intervention of interest is treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the commercially available MicroVention Woven EndoBridge device. The device is an intrasaccular flow disruption device used during endovascular treatment according to routine clinical practice and the approved instructions for use. Treatment decisions and procedural details are determined by the treating physician.

Sponsors

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Lead SponsorOTHER
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
ZhuHai Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhujiang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhongnan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tongji Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Huashan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fudan University
CollaboratorOTHER
RenJi Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ruijin Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanyang Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medicial University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
West China Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The First Hospital of Jilin University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Hospital of Jilin University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanjing Gulou Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
First Hospital of China Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital Of Guizhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
MicroVention, Inc., a Terumo company
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Anhui Provincial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Zhongshan Hospital of Hubei Province
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Beijing Haidian Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University Third Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Yichang Central People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command
CollaboratorOTHER
The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command
CollaboratorOTHER
Southwest Hospital, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangxi Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tangshan Worker's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Retrospective Cohort: * Participants of any age and sex. * Patients treated for an intracranial aneurysm using a commercially available MicroVention Woven EndoBridge device. * Patients who completed at least one postoperative imaging follow-up. Prospective Cohort: * Participants of any age and sex. * Patients treated for an intracranial aneurysm using a commercially available MicroVention Woven EndoBridge device. * The participant, or legally authorized representative if applicable, understands the study requirements and procedures and provides written informed consent before any study-specific data collection.

Exclusion criteria

Retrospective Cohort: * Patients treated with a Woven EndoBridge device for whom intraoperative or postoperative follow-up imaging data are not available. * Patients considered by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in this study. Prospective Cohort: * Participants who are currently participating in, or plan to participate during the follow-up period, another clinical study that may affect the results of this study. * Patients who are currently unable or expected to be unable to complete follow-up. * Patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year due to other diseases or conditions. * Patients considered by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Major Adverse EventsUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureMajor adverse events include unexpected death or major stroke within 30 days after the procedure, and neurological death or major stroke from 31 days to 1 year after the procedure. Major stroke is defined as an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke associated with an increase of more than 4 points in the NIHSS score.
Proportion of Aneurysms With Adequate Occlusion Based on Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification12 Months After the Index ProcedureAdequate aneurysm occlusion is defined as Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification class I or II at the 12-month follow-up. Class I indicates complete occlusion, and class II indicates residual neck without contrast filling of the aneurysm sac.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Aneurysms With Adequate Occlusion Based on WEB Occlusion Scale12 Months After the Index ProcedureAdequate aneurysm occlusion will be assessed by an independent imaging core laboratory using the Woven EndoBridge Occlusion Scale. The Woven EndoBridge Occlusion Scale is a categorical angiographic scale ranging from Class A to Class D: Class A indicates complete occlusion, Class B indicates complete occlusion with recess filling, Class C indicates neck remnant, and Class D indicates aneurysm remnant. Adequate occlusion is defined as Class A, Class B, or Class C. Class D indicates inadequate occlusion. This is a categorical scale; higher or lower numerical scores are not applicable.
Aneurysm Occlusion Status Based on Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification and WEB Occlusion Scale12 Months After the Index ProcedureAneurysm occlusion status will be assessed by an independent imaging core laboratory using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification and the Woven EndoBridge Occlusion Scale. The Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification is a categorical angiographic classification ranging from Class I to Class III: Class I indicates complete occlusion, Class II indicates residual neck, and Class III indicates residual aneurysm. The Woven EndoBridge Occlusion Scale is a categorical angiographic scale ranging from Class A to Class D: Class A indicates complete occlusion, Class B indicates complete occlusion with recess filling, Class C indicates neck remnant, and Class D indicates aneurysm remnant. These are categorical scales; higher or lower numerical scores are not applicable.
Aneurysm Occlusion Without Rebleeding in Ruptured Aneurysms12 Months After the Index ProcedureIn participants with ruptured aneurysms, aneurysm occlusion status will be assessed together with the absence of rebleeding.
Aneurysm Occlusion Without Rebleeding or Retreatment in Aneurysms With Residual Filling12 Months After the Index ProcedureIn aneurysms with residual filling, occlusion status will be assessed together with absence of rebleeding in ruptured aneurysms or absence of retreatment.
Stability of Aneurysm OcclusionFrom 6 Months to 12 Months After the Index ProcedureOcclusion stability will be assessed by comparing imaging results between the 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits and classified as unchanged, improved, or worsened.
Aneurysm RecurrenceUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureAneurysm recurrence is defined as aneurysm growth or recanalization within 1 year after the index procedure.
Aneurysm RetreatmentUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureThe proportion of participants who undergo retreatment of the target aneurysm within 1 year will be assessed.
Unplanned Retreatment or Alternative TreatmentUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureThe proportion of participants who undergo unplanned retreatment or alternative treatment due to aneurysm recurrence or residual aneurysm will be assessed.
Rebleeding Within 30 Days in Ruptured AneurysmsUp to 30 Days After the Index ProcedureIn participants with ruptured aneurysms, rebleeding within 30 days after the procedure will be assessed, excluding intraprocedural rupture or bleeding.
Rebleeding Within 1 Year in Ruptured AneurysmsUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureIn participants with ruptured aneurysms, rebleeding within 1 year after the procedure will be assessed, excluding intraprocedural rupture or bleeding.
New Bleeding of the Target Aneurysm in Unruptured AneurysmsUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureIn participants with unruptured aneurysms, new bleeding of the target aneurysm within 1 year will be assessed, excluding intraprocedural rupture or bleeding.
Parent Artery Patency12 Months After the Index ProcedureParent artery patency will be assessed at 1 year, defined as less than 50% stenosis of the parent artery or absence of clinical symptoms.
Clinical Outcome Measured by Modified Rankin Scale30 Days, 6 Months, and 12 Months After the Index ProcedureClinical outcome will be assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The Modified Rankin Scale is an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates no symptoms, 5 indicates severe disability, and 6 indicates death. Higher scores indicate worse functional outcome.
Device-Related Serious Adverse EventsUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureSerious adverse events related to the study device will be collected and summarized.
Procedure-Related Serious Adverse EventsUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureSerious adverse events related to the procedure will be collected and summarized.
Device- or Procedure-Related Adverse EventsUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedurePeriprocedural and postprocedural adverse events related to the device or procedure will be collected and summarized.
Neurological EventsUp to 1 Year After the Index ProcedureNeurological events will include ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, neurological death, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, arterial thrombosis, parent artery or branch artery perforation or rupture, and transient ischemic attack.
Proportion of Target Aneurysms With Successful Woven EndoBridge Device ImplantationDuring the Index ProcedureSuccessful device implantation will be assessed using the procedure record and electronic case report form. Successful Woven EndoBridge device implantation is defined as successful deployment and detachment of the Woven EndoBridge device in the target aneurysm during the index procedure. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of target aneurysms with successful device implantation among target aneurysms in which Woven EndoBridge device implantation was attempted. Reasons for unsuccessful implantation, such as inappropriate device size or model, unsuitable target aneurysm anatomy, unfavorable angle, vascular tortuosity preventing access to the lesion, or other reasons, will be recorded when applicable.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTHongqi Zhang, M.D
xwzhanghq@163.com+8613601374152
CONTACTXin Su, M.D
1258940078@qq.com+8618210685023
STUDY_CHAIRHongqi Zhang

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

STUDY_DIRECTORHongqi Zhang

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORXin Su

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSimin Wang

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 12, 2026