Skip to content

Comparison of Citrate and Heparin Anticoagulation During Postdilution Hemodiafiltration

Efficiency and Biocompatibility of Postdilution Hemodiafiltration Using Different Anticoagulation Methods: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07618858
Acronym
CITRA-HDF
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-06-01
Start date
2026-06-05
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hemodialysis, End-Stage Kidney Disease, Hemodiafiltration, Renal Failure

Keywords

Citrate anticoagulation, Heparin anticoagulation, Hemodiafiltration, Dialysis, Biocompatibility, Beta-2 microglobulin, Complement activation, Regional citrate anticoagulation, Chronic dialysis, Thrombin-antithrombin complex, Platelet factor 4

Brief summary

This randomized crossover clinical trial will compare regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) and standard heparin anticoagulation (HA) during postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) in chronic dialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate biocompatibility during HDF by measuring markers of complement activation (C3a), platelet activation (PF4), and coagulation activation (thrombin-antithrombin complex, TAT). Secondary aims include comparison of solute removal efficiency, including beta-2 microglobulin, phosphate, and urea removal, as well as assessment of citrate, calcium, and magnesium kinetics during citrate anticoagulation. Twenty adult chronic dialysis patients will undergo two study HDF procedures in randomized order: one procedure using heparin anticoagulation and one procedure using regional citrate anticoagulation with a one-week interval between procedures. The study aims to improve understanding of the effects of anticoagulation methods on hemodiafiltration biocompatibility and dialysis efficiency and may contribute to optimization of citrate anticoagulation protocols in chronic hemodiafiltration patients.

Detailed description

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is an advanced renal replacement therapy combining diffusion and convection, allowing improved removal of middle and larger molecular weight solutes compared with standard hemodialysis. During extracorporeal circulation, blood contact with artificial membranes and tubing activates complement, platelets, leukocytes, and coagulation pathways, requiring anticoagulation during the procedure. Unfractionated heparin is routinely used for anticoagulation during HDF. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is mainly used in patients at increased bleeding risk. Previous studies in hemodialysis have suggested that citrate anticoagulation may improve biocompatibility because many blood-material interactions are calcium- and magnesium-dependent. However, biocompatibility during HDF using citrate versus heparin anticoagulation has not been systematically investigated. This prospective randomized crossover clinical trial will include 20 adult patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving maintenance postdilution hemodiafiltration three times weekly. Patients will be randomized to one of two anticoagulation sequences: heparin-citrate or citrate-heparin. Each participant will undergo two study HDF procedures separated by a one-week interval. During heparin anticoagulation, unfractionated heparin will be administered according to body weight using standard clinical protocols. During citrate anticoagulation, 8% trisodium citrate infusion and calcium-free dialysate will be used, with continuous calcium chloride substitution adjusted according to ionized calcium levels. Biocompatibility markers including complement activation marker C3a, platelet factor 4 (PF4), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), blood cell counts, and coagulation parameters will be assessed before HDF, after 15 minutes, and at the end of the procedure. Dialysis efficiency will be evaluated by measurement of reduction ratios and total removal of beta-2 microglobulin, phosphate, and urea using partial dialysate collection methodology. Additional secondary outcomes include assessment of citrate, calcium, and magnesium kinetics during RCA-HDF, visual clotting score evaluation of the extracorporeal circuit, and optimization of citrate anticoagulation protocols during postdilution HDF. The study may contribute to improved understanding of anticoagulation-related biocompatibility during HDF and support wider evidence-based use of regional citrate anticoagulation in chronic dialysis patients.

Interventions

Regional citrate anticoagulation using 8% trisodium citrate infusion during postdilution hemodiafiltration with calcium substitution adjusted according to ionized calcium levels.

DRUGUnfractionated heparin

Standard unfractionated heparin anticoagulation administered according to routine clinical protocol during postdilution hemodiafiltration.

Sponsors

University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will undergo two study hemodiafiltration procedures in randomized order: one procedure using heparin anticoagulation and one procedure using regional citrate anticoagulation, with a one-week interval between procedures.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 years or older * End-stage kidney disease requiring maintenance postdilution hemodiafiltration * Stable chronic hemodialysis treatment three times weekly * Functional arteriovenous fistula

Exclusion criteria

* Therapeutic anticoagulation therapy * Dual antiplatelet therapy * Significant coagulopathy * Active bleeding * Acute kidney injury

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biocompatibility markers (C3a, PF4, TAT)Before hemodiafiltration, after 15 minutes of treatment, and immediately before the end of the procedure.Comparison of complement activation marker C3a, platelet factor 4 (PF4), and thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) concentrations between citrate and heparin anticoagulation during postdilution hemodiafiltration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Beta-2 microglobulin removalBefore, after 30 minutes and at the end of the procedure hemodiafiltration procedure.Reduction ratio and total removal of beta-2 microglobulin during hemodiafiltration.
instantaneous urea clearance after 30 minutesafter 30 minutes of dialysisinstantaneous urea clearance after 30 minutes
p-cresyl sulfat removalP-cresyl sulfat removal before, during and to the end of procedureP-cresyl sulfat removal before, after 30 minutes and at the end of the procedure
Ionized calcium kineticsDuring the 4-hour hemodiafiltration procedureDuring citrate anticoagulation procedure
Extracorporeal circuit clotting scoreAt the end of hemodiafiltration procedure.

Countries

Slovenia

Contacts

CONTACTMilena MD Andonova
milena.andonova@kclj.si+38615228123

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 2, 2026