Skip to content

This Study is Conducted to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of Indirect Overlay Restorations With Different Cavity Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars.

A Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Overlay Restorations With Different Cavity Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars: Two Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07614451
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-05-29
Start date
2026-06-15
Completion date
2028-08-15
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endodontically Treated Molar

Keywords

overlay, endodontically treated molars, biomimetic preparation

Brief summary

This study is conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of indirect overlay restorations with different cavity preparation designs in endodontically treated molars over two years.

Detailed description

First Validation of endodontic treatment using a periapical radiograph and proper history taking. {I}• Cavity Preparation Procedures for Comparator Group: * Removal of any remnants of temporary filling and excess gutta percha to the level of root canal orifice. * Removal of all undermined enamel. * Then 1.5 to 2 mm cusp reduction will be performed for the buccal and lingual walls. * The occlusal box will be of 2.5 mm width, 2 mm depth cavity walls and will be flared to produce a 6 degree of divergence. * The cavity will have internal rounded angles, finished enamel with sharp non-beveled margins and smooth well-defined walls. * Immediate Dentin Sealing and Cavity Optimization: Immediate dentin sealing will be performed through the use of a universal adhesive followed by the injection of injectable flowable resin composite. Blocking of undercuts using injectable flowable resin composite and margin elevation if required. * The final retentive design will include occlusal clearance of 2 mm with occlusal box cavity of depth 2 mm with all margins in enamel occlusally and all dentin surfaces will be covered. {II}• Cavity Preparation Procedures for Intervention Group: * Removal of any remnants of temporary filling and excess gutta percha to the level of root canal orifice. * No additional removal of the tooth structure will be performed at this step. * Cavity optimization will be performed first. * Blocking of undercuts using injectable flowable resin composite and margin elevation if required. * The occlusal cavity will be restored during cavity optimization with injectable resin composite to reduce the areas of dentin exposure and preserve the remaining tooth structure. * The dentin substitute resin composite will establish the biobase. * An anatomical non retentive preparation design will be performed to show continuous inclined plane preparation with 2 mm cuspal reduction, concave chamfer margins, and 1 to 1.5 mm thick butt-joint preparation in the interproximal portion. * The final cavity design will include occlusal clearance of 2 mm with total cusp coverage, with biomimetic features (anatomical, non-retentive design) with no occlusal box cavity. * The CAD/CAM partial coverage overlay restoration will be designed, then milled using SHOFU Hard hybrid ceramic blocks for both groups following its design. * Cementation for both groups: * Selective etching of the enamel margins of the cavity will be made using 37% phosphoric acid. * Application of Universal Adhesive according to manufacturer's instructions and cured. * Regarding the milled indirect overlay restorations; surface roughening with Dura-Green Stones SHOFU will be performed, followed by the application of a suitable priming agent, then the injection of resin cement in the fitting surface, and finally the restoration will be cemented. * Restoration will be placed onto the prepared cavities allowing for excess resin cement to emerge which will then be tac-cured for 5 second using a standard intensity light cure allowing for slight hardening of the excess resin cement. * Removal of excess cement using a sharp explorer, excavator or a c-blade along with the use of interdental flossing to ensure elimination of interdental excess resin cement material. * Completing the remaining curing cycle after excess removal to the full curing time.

Interventions

OTHERhybrid ceramic retentive overlay

Endodontically treated molars will receive indirect overlay restorations utilizing a conventional retentive occlusal box cavity design.

OTHERhybrid ceramic non-retentive overlay

Endodontically treated molars will receive indirect overlay restorations utilizing a minimal invasive anatomical non-retentive design.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient Related Criteria: * Adult patients (age: 20-60 years) of both genders. * Healthy patients (not suffering of any systematic or chronic diseases). * Able to tolerate the necessary restorative procedures. * Willing to sign the informed ethical consent. * Accepts the follow-up period. Tooth Related Criteria: * Proper endodontically treated teeth. * First and second permanent molars. * Absence of any peri-apical lesions. * Absence of any periodontal disease involvement. * Large access cavities with one or two missing walls. * Patients with proper oral hygiene. * Presence of opposing tooth.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient related: * Patients younger than 20 or older than 60 years old. * Pregnant females. * Patients with any systemic or chronic diseases. * Patients not accepting the follow-up period. * Patients not willing to sign the informed ethical consent. * Patients with known allergies to latex and/or resinous material. Tooth related * Endodontically treated anterior, premolar and third molar teeth. * Hopelessly carious/destructed teeth necessitating extraction. * Mobile teeth, indicating periodontal disease or trauma. * External or internal resorption. * Poor endodontic treatment. * Periapical lesion present. * Cervical carious lesions involved.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal adaptation (success rate)T0: baseline T1: 6 months T2: 12 months T3: 18 months T4: 2 yearsMeasuring device: Modified FDI criteria, Measuring unit: Ordinal Data (scores)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
proximal contact point 3.fracture of material and retention 4.wear 5. marginal staining 6. color match 7.caries at restoration marginT0: baseline T1: 6 months T2: 12 months T3: 18 months T4: 2 yearsMeasuring device: Modified FDI criteria, Measuring unit: Ordinal Data (scores)

Contacts

CONTACTSara Ibrahim Fahmy, PhD
sara.fahmy@dentistry.cu.edu.eg01006256086
CONTACTAya Mohamed Adly, Lecturer
aya.mohamed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
STUDY_DIRECTOROlfat ElSayed Hassanein, Professor

Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026