Skip to content

Biomechanical Evaluation With Finite Element Models in Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthitis: Prospective Comparative Analysis of Loads in Arthroplasty With or Without Implants

Biomechanical Evaluation With Finite Element Models in Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthitis: Prospective Comparative Analysis of Loads in Arthroplasty With or Without Implants

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07614269
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-05-29
Start date
2026-06-15
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis, carpometacarpal prosthesis, Thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty

Brief summary

To better understand the load distribution in the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint (CMC joint) in presence of osteoarthritis and how surgery by means of a suspension-resection arthroplasty or a joint replacement by means of a metal prosthesis affects this load distribution. These studies allow to supporting medical decisions and surgical treatments results with biomechanical evidence.The clinical management of the patients will be adapted to the treatment standards of the Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Service of the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, without the performance of this study influencing this process.

Detailed description

For determine the normal kinematics of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, Imaeda et al. (1994) examined in specimens four conditions which simulated normal function of the thumb: a) passive circumduction, b) active circumduction, c) static loading, and d) single-axis loading. Changes in normal kinematics predispose the CMC joint to osteoarthritis (OA). Previous studies used radiographic techniques that usually were static or measured the end range of motion. For thumb CMC joint OA the prosthesis or total joint arthroplasty is one of the surgical option. Murai (2022) studied in ten healthy men with reconstruction 3D bone models the optimal center of rotation of the implant and found that the center of rotation change across various thumb positions. In the study by D´Agostino et al. (2018) a CT scan was used to quantify the 3D thumb kinematics in four female patients, before and after trapeziometacarpal joint replacement surgery with the Arpe implant. Thumb CMC joint OA led to a marked decrease of internal rotation and abduction of the first metacarpal during thumb flexion and a decrease of metacarpal adduction during thumb adduction. The abcense of first metacarpal translation in the ball-and-socket implant seems to indicate a decrease of first metacarpal adduction. Advanced thumb CMC joint OA mainly restrict the first metacarpal mobility. Whereas prosthesis is able to restore thumb function, it cannot fully replicate the kinematics of the healthy trapeziometacarpal joint. This study will include 40 adults patients with chronic pain and carpometacarpal osteoarthritis that need surgical intervention. For the biomechanical evaluation, 3D modeling and finite element methods of evaluation of the CT scan before and after the surgical intervention in each patient will be performed with the computed specific software Epylisis and Ansys in Dimension Lab 3D, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau by biomedical engineers. The source of information is the journals and journals specialized in hand surgery, bioengineering, biotechnology and biomedical engineering. The principal investigator and collaborators are responsible for creating the database and entering data. Statistical analysis requires support from the statistics unit of the UICEC/Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. All data will be collected in REDCap.

Interventions

PROCEDURETrapezectomy and carpometacarpal joint resection-supension arthroplasty

Carpometacarpal arthroplasty without implant: Trapezectomy and ligamentoplasty.

PROCEDURETrapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis

Joint carpometacarpal prostesis

Sponsors

Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 88 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary Osteoarthritis in thumb CMC joint in the hand * Adults aged between 50 and 88 years old included. * Thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis, radiographic stages II, III and IV by Eaton- Littler classification (1973).

Exclusion criteria

* Asymptomatic primary osteoarthritis in thumb CMC joint * Patients with osteoarthritis and age less than 50 years or more than 88 years. * Patients who have had previous interventions in the area, in this joint, injuries in this hand or fractures. * Patients with rheumatic diseases or collagen diseases that create joint instability. * Patients with physical or mental conditions that preclude intervention. * Thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis, radiographic stages I by Eaton-Littler classification (1973)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thumb carpometarcarpal joint radiological evaluation12 monthsStandard radiographs are required x-rays in posteroanterior (PA), PA in pronation (Robert´s view) and lateral views for assessment of the radiological stages of Eaton-Littler modified by Eaton-Glicker classification (1973). This classification include four stages of progression of the loss cartilage in thumb CMC joint, from I to IV. The X-rays will made in clinics at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical repair.
Thumb carpometacarpal joint CT scan evaluation12 monthsA Computed Tomography (CT) scan is also required for the initial evaluation and regular control of these patients. For each participant, CT scans will be perform in static limb positions before and after the surgery.
3D modeling and finite element methods of evaluation of the CT scan before and after surgical intervention.12 monthsIn each patient will be performed with the computed specific software Epylisis and Ansys in Dimension Lab 3D, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau by biomedical engineers. To obtain the 3D geometrical information for a subject-specific finite element human hand, CT images will take from patients. Each scan is recontructed in a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format. These 2D data (DICOM data collection) are process using medical image processing software Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). All the CT images will be segmented manually into the bones and skin, while subcutaneous tissues and tendons will be reconstructed based on CT images. A specific software (Epylisis, Ansys) will be used to simulated the loads in the thumb CMC joint. Epylisis is one of this specific software based on the Finite Element Methods (FEM), enables computational simulation of the biomechanical behavior of the trapeziometacarpal joint. It is used to conduct mechanistic analyses

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain pre and postoperative12 monthsA Visual Analoge Scale (VAS) is used to assess pain (range, 0-10). This scale is from 0, no pain to 10, uncontrollable pain.
Pinch force pre and postoperative12 monthsA pinch Jamar dynamometer is used to measure pinch force, scale from 0-30 Kilograms (Sammons Preston, Bolingbrook, IL, USA).
Grip Strength pre and postoperative12 monthsA Jamar dynamometer is used to assess grip strength, scale from 0 to 90 Kilograms (Sammons Preston, Bolingbrook, IL, USA).
Range of motion12 monthsA goniometer is used to assess the thumb CMC range of motion (flexion, extension, adduction, abduction), measure in grades from 0-90º.
Questionnaire QuickDash12 monthsThe clinical and functional outcomes is evaluate using the Questionnaire QuickDash, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, consist of 30 items (11 items, scored 1-5). The QuickDASH score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).

Contacts

CONTACTClaudia Lamas, MD, Ph D
clamasg@santpau.cat00-34-5537032

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026