Skip to content

Impact of Hyperemic State on Angio-IMR Performance

The Impact of Hyperemic State on the Performance of Angiography Derived Indices in Assessing Coronary Microvascular Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07613996
Enrollment
192
Registered
2026-05-29
Start date
2026-05-04
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Microvascular Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Physiology, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Index of Microcirculatory Resistance, Angiography-Derived Indices

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of angiography-derived microcirculatory indices (Angio-IMR) in assessing patients with stable angina or suspected coronary artery disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: How do the numerical values of Angio-IMR from five different software vendors change across three physiological states (resting, sub-hyperemia induced by nitroglycerin, and maximal hyperemia induced by adenosine)? Which physiological state and software algorithm provide the highest diagnostic accuracy (Area Under the Curve, AUC) for diagnosing Coronary Microvascular Disease (CMD) when compared to the gold standard wire-based IMR? Researchers will compare the Angio-IMR results calculated under the three different physiological conditions within the same patient to see how the hyperemic state impacts the performance and consistency of these non-invasive indices. Participants will: Undergo standard-of-care coronary angiography and physiological assessment using a pressure wire for index of microvascular resistance (Wire-IMR) as part of their clinical management. Have their angiographic images captured at three specific time points: at rest, after intracoronary nitroglycerin, and during adenosine-induced maximal hyperemia. Allow their de-identified imaging and clinical data to be analyzed by an independent core laboratory using five different Angio-IMR software platforms to evaluate microvascular function.

Detailed description

Study Overview and Procedural Protocol This is a prospective, multi-center, diagnostic accuracy study employing a self-controlled design. All participants will undergo coronary angiography and physiological assessment according to standard clinical indications. During the procedure, specific angiographic images will be systematically captured for the target vessel at three distinct physiological time points: Resting State: Baseline coronary angiography without any hyperemic agents. Sub-hyperemic State: Following the intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin. Maximal Hyperemic State: During continuous intracoronary infusion of adenosine to achieve maximal microvascular vasodilation. Immediately following image acquisition, the reference standard measurement-Wire-IMR-will be performed using a pressure-sensor-equipped guidewire under maximal hyperemia. Core Laboratory Imaging Analysis and Blinding All angiographic data will be de-identified and transferred to a centralized, independent Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The analysis will be conducted as follows: Software Platforms: Five different commercially available Angio-IMR software platforms (anonymized as A, B, C, D, and E) will be used to calculate microvascular resistance. Independent Analysis: Five dedicated analysts, each specialized in one specific software platform, will perform the calculations. Each analyst will be blinded to the patients' clinical information, the Wire-IMR gold standard results, and the results from the other four software platforms. Standardization: A primary researcher, not involved in the software measurements, will pre-define the target vessel segments and measurement frames to ensure consistency across all five software platforms. Statistical Considerations and Data Management The study aims to determine if the coronary hyperemic state significantly alters the fluid dynamics modeling utilized by Angio-IMR algorithms. AUC will be calculated for each software at each of the three states. A head-to-head comparison of AUCs will be performed using DeLong's test. To maintain data integrity, results from the core laboratory and the clinical centers will remain strictly separated until the final database lock.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAngiography-derived IMR

Unlike the reference standard "Wire-IMR," which requires the advancement of a specialized pressure-sensor guidewire into the distal coronary artery, Angio-IMR is a wire-free technology. It derives microvascular resistance indices purely through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or specialized mathematical models based on standard coronary angiographic projections. This eliminates the risk of wire-induced vascular injury or spasm.

Sponsors

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhongnan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The 7th People's Hospital of Zhengzhou
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable angina or suspected coronary heart disease. * Scheduled for coronary angiography and physiological assessment. * Target vessel with stenosis \< 50% or 50%-90% with fractional flow reserve (FFR) \> 0.80. * Provided informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Hemodynamic instability (acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, severe arrhythmia). * Contraindications to angiography (e.g., end-stage renal disease). * Contraindications to adenosine (e.g., severe asthma, high-degree atrial-ventricular block). * Life expectancy \< 1 year or pregnancy. * Target vessel unsuitable for wire operation (left main lesion, severe tortuosity) or stenosis \> 90%.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC)BaselineComparison of AUC for 5 types of Angio-IMR against Wire-IMR (Gold standard, CMD defined as Wire-IMR ≥ 25) under three states.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic AccuracyBaselineSensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value.
CorrelationBaselinePearson/Spearman coefficients between Angio-IMR and Wire-IMR.
AgreementBaselineBland-Altman analysis (Bias and Limits of Agreement).
Inter-vendor AgreementBaselineConsistency between different software brands.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTChenguang Li, MD, PhD
li.chenguang@zs-hospital.sh.cn021 6404 1990
CONTACTJinying Zhou, MD, PhD
zhou.jinying@zs-hospital.sh.cn

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026