Skip to content

FASCIA ILIACA BLOCK VERSUS INTRAVENOUS NALBUPHINE AS ANALGESIC METHOD BEFORE POSITIONING FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR HIP FRACTURES

FASCIA ILIACA BLOCK VERSUS INTRAVENOUS NALBUPHINE AS ANALGESIC METHOD BEFORE POSITIONING FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR HIP FRACTURES

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07613801
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-05-29
Start date
2026-05-12
Completion date
2026-11-12
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fracture Surgeries

Brief summary

Investigators will compare FASCIA ILIACA BLOCK VERSUS INTRAVENOUS NALBUPHINE AS ANALGESIC METHOD BEFORE POSITIONING FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR HIP FRACTURES

Interventions

DRUGBupivacain

We will compare fascia ILIACA block with nalbuphine

DRUGNalbuphine

We will compare this with fascia ilaca block

Sponsors

Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age above 30 years

Exclusion criteria

* Age before 30

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain score(VAS score) after 15 minutes of either intervention before spinal anesthesia15 minutes
Quality of positioning for spinal anesthesia after 15 minutes of either intervention15 minutesScale of 0-3 for hip flexion while sitting after either intervention 0=not satisfactory (poor hip flexion) 1. satisfactory (slight hip flexion) 2. good (adequate hip flexion) 3. optimal (excellent hip flexion)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of heart rate15 minutesMeasured in beat per minute
Assessment of blood pressure15 minutesMeasured in mmHg
Comfort of patient15 minutesObjective observational pain indicators reflecting the patient's acceptance and and tolerance of positioning. 0=calm 1. facial grimacing 2. moaning 3. screaming 4. unable to proceed due to agitation or restlessness

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026