Skip to content

Tertiary Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Double Mandibular Cortical Bone Blocks Technique Versus Double Iliac Corticocancellous Bone Blocks Technique

Tertiary Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Double Mandibular Cortical Bone Blocks Technique Versus Double Iliac Corticocancellous Bone Blocks Technique A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07612423
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-05-28
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2028-01-01
Last updated
2026-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Cleft Grafting

Brief summary

The current study aims to compare the double mandibular corticocancellous bone blocks technique with mandibular cancellous bone particles in between versus the double iliac corticocancellous bone blocks technique with iliac cancellous bone particles in between in the tertiary cleft grafting to find out which technique maintained better graft width, height, and volume with the least adverse effects after the healing period and hence would allow for restoration of the targeted function and esthetics and improve the cleft patients psychologically and hence improve their quality of life.

Interventions

patients with unilateral alveolar cleft treated withthe double mandibular corticocancellous bone blocks technique with mandibular cancellous bone particles in between.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with unilateral alveolar cleft who missed the mixed dentition phase window. * patients with previously repaired cleft lip and palate. * patients with proper oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

* Immunocompromised patients. * patients with active periodontitis. * patients with inadequate oral hygiene.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of gained bone volume after 6 months of graft healing in cubic millimeter by CBCT analysis6 monthsMeasurement of gained bone volume after 6 months of graft healing in cubic millimeter by comparison between CBCT scans that will be taken postoperatively, and after 6 months postoperatively. volume assessment will be by specialized software 3D Slicer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of gained bone labio-palatal width and height in millimeter by CBCT analysis6 monthsMeasurement of gained bone labio-palatal width and height in millimeter after 6 months of graft healing by comparison between CBCT scans that will be taken postoperatively, and after 6 months postoperatively by specialized software Atomica ai.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 27, 2026