Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Alginate, Magaldrate, Sucralfate, Proton Pump Inhibitors, and Diet in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

Comparative Effectiveness of Alginate, Magaldrate, Sucralfate, Proton Pump Inhibitors, and Diet in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07611162
Enrollment
800
Registered
2026-05-28
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2030-05-01
Last updated
2026-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of different treatments for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) in adult patients with confirmed symptoms and signs of the condition. The main question it aims to answer is: Which treatment (Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs), alginate, magaldrate, sucralfate, or diet) leads to the greatest improvement in LPRD symptoms and clinical signs over 3 months? Researchers will compare proton pump inhibitors to alternative medical treatments and dietary management to see which approach is most effective and better tolerated. Participants will: * undergo a clinical ENT examination with scoring of reflux signs (RSA) * complete symptom questionnaires (RSS) assessing severity, frequency, and impact of symptoms * receive one of the study treatments (medication or dietary intervention) * be evaluated at baseline and again after 3 months of treatment

Interventions

Use of Gaviscon anti-acid, anti-reflux

use of Riopan drug

use of Kéal sucralfate

Use of Omeprazole, Esomeprazole, Lansoprazole, Pantoprazole, Rabeprazole

BEHAVIORALDiet

Patients are recommended to adhere to a 3-month low-fat, low quick-release sugar, high-protein, alkaline, and plant-based diet. The consumption of fish and meat was authorized but reduced to low-fat fish and meat. The anti-reflux diet considered the exclusion/reduction of additional triggers such as caffeine or theine, spices, tomatoes, fatty, cheese alcohol, and sparkling beverages.

Sponsors

University of Mons
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Positive 24-h HEMII-pH \> 1 event

Exclusion criteria

* Smoker (\>5 cigarettes/day) , alcohol dependence (\>3 units/day), * upper respiratory tract infection within the last month, * pregnancy, * neurological or psychiatric illness, * previous history of neck surgery or trauma, * malignancy, * history of head and neck radiotherapy * active seasonal allergies or asthma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the effectiveness of each intervention based on changes in Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) and Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) from pre- to post-treatment follow-up.From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

CONTACTJérome R Lechien, MD, PhD, MS, FACS
jerome.lechien@umons.ac.be+32 498 64 09 19

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026