Skip to content

Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) and Ultra-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNI), in Renal Stones <20 mm.

Comparison of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) and Ultra-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), in Renal Stones <20 mm.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07610252
Enrollment
138
Registered
2026-05-27
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Calculi

Brief summary

There is a dearth of information comparing ultra-mini PNCL with ESWI in Pakistan for kidney stones smaller than 20 mm. Hence the current study was planned with the objective of comparing the outcome of ESWL and ultra-mini PCNL in renal stones less than 20 mm.

Detailed description

Even though small PCNL and ESWL are tried-and-true techniques for kidney calculus, their usage poses unique challenges since they need precision to guarantee effective stone removal while minimizing invasiveness. Despite these advantages, selecting the optimum course of action is challenging due to risks of both modalities. The results of this investigation would therefore help to improve the treatment of the patients with renal proximal stones that are smaller than 20 mm.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltra-mini PCNL

Patients were treated with ultra-mini PCNL with DJ stent implantation.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with DJ stent implantation was performed in patients. Typically, the therapy began with a lower power of 1 kV and was progressively increased to 20 kV. Each session included no more than 2000 shocks.

Sponsors

Muhammad Aamir Latif
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of any gender * Aged 20-60 years * With a single kidney stone in renal pelvis smaller than 20 mm

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Hemorrhage problems * Sepsis and pyonephrosis * With pelvic kidneys * Obstruction of the pelvi-ureteric junction * Chronic illness (chronic liver disease, chronic renal failure, chronic drug use)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone clearance4 weeksThe frequency of the patients with full stone clearance was noted and cmpared between the groups.
Urinary tract infection4 weeksThe frequency of patients reported with urinary tract infection was noted and compared between the groups.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMuhammad Saleem

Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur

STUDY_DIRECTORMumtaz Rasool, FCPS

Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 28, 2026