Skip to content

Imagery Control Therapy and Lucid Dreaming for REM-Related Symptoms in Narcolepsy

Imagery Control Therapy and Lucid Dreaming for REM-Related Symptoms in Narcolepsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07609537
Acronym
ICLDR-NAR Tria
Enrollment
98
Registered
2026-05-27
Start date
2024-03-01
Completion date
2025-06-15
Last updated
2026-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence, Hypnagogic Hallucinations, Narcolepsy Type 1, REM Sleep Intrusion Symptoms, Sleep Paralysis

Keywords

Narcolepsy, REM sleep, Lucid dreaming, Imagery Control Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Hypnagogic hallucinations, Sleep paralysis, REM sleep intrusion, Excessive daytime sleepiness, Narcolepsy Type 1, Central disorders of hypersomnolence, Sleep disorder therapy

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral intervention based on lucid dreaming training and imagery control therapy for reducing REM-related symptoms in patients with narcolepsy type 1. Specifically, the study examined the impact of the intervention on hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis, which are common and distressing symptoms associated with REM sleep intrusions in narcolepsy. Ninety-eight adults with confirmed narcolepsy type 1 were randomly assigned to either an experimental intervention group or a control group receiving standard pharmacological treatment, structured clinical follow-up, and sleep hygiene psychoeducation. The intervention consisted of six weekly 90-minute telehealth sessions integrating psychoeducation, dream awareness training, lucid dreaming induction techniques, imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT), metacognitive strategies, emotional regulation, and relapse prevention. Primary outcomes included changes in the frequency and distress associated with hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis. Secondary outcomes included subjective sleep quality, metacognitive dream-related variables, and quality of life. Participants were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluations. The study aimed to determine whether behavioral interventions targeting dream awareness, emotional regulation, and metacognitive control could complement pharmacological treatment and improve REM-related symptoms and sleep-related quality of life in narcolepsy.

Detailed description

Detailed Description Narcolepsy type 1 is a chronic neurological sleep-wake disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, and REM sleep dissociation phenomena, including hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis. Although pharmacological therapies are effective for managing daytime sleepiness and cataplexy, treatment options for REM-related perceptual symptoms remain limited. Hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis are frequently associated with emotional distress, impaired quality of life, anxiety, and sleep disruption. Lucid dreaming refers to the awareness of dreaming while the dream is occurring and may involve the ability to voluntarily influence dream content. Previous studies have suggested that lucid dreaming training and imagery-based cognitive techniques may reduce emotional distress associated with nightmares and other disturbing dream experiences. Given the high prevalence of lucid dreaming experiences among patients with narcolepsy, these strategies may represent a promising behavioral approach for REM-related symptoms. This study was designed as a randomized controlled longitudinal trial to evaluate the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral intervention integrating lucid dreaming training and imagery control therapy in patients with narcolepsy type 1. The study was conducted between March 2023 and April 2025 using synchronous telehealth sessions delivered through a secure videoconferencing platform. A total of 98 participants with clinically and polysomnographically confirmed narcolepsy type 1 were recruited from specialized sleep medicine centers in Colombia and Costa Rica. Eligible participants were adults presenting clinically significant hypnagogic hallucinations and/or sleep paralysis and receiving stable pharmacological treatment. Participants with severe psychiatric disorders, dissociative disorders, or active substance use disorders were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Experimental group (n = 49): received six weekly 90-minute sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for narcolepsy (CBT-NAR) integrating lucid dreaming training and imagery control therapy in addition to stable pharmacological treatment. Control group (n = 49): continued standard pharmacological treatment with structured clinical follow-up and sleep hygiene psychoeducation focused on sleep-wake regularity, scheduled naps, healthy sleep habits, and general education about narcolepsy. The intervention was delivered by trained clinical psychologists specialized in behavioral sleep medicine. Treatment components included: Psychoeducation about narcolepsy and REM-related symptoms. Dream diary monitoring and dream awareness training. Lucid dreaming induction and maintenance techniques. Reality testing and metacognitive strategies. Imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) and imagery restructuring techniques. Emotional regulation and coping strategies within lucid dreams. Relapse prevention and guided autonomous practice. Primary outcomes were reductions in the frequency and distress associated with hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis. Secondary outcomes included subjective sleep quality assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), narcolepsy symptom severity assessed with the Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), dream-related metacognitive variables assessed with the LUCID Scale, and quality of life assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Student's t-tests, Cohen's d effect sizes, mixed-effects longitudinal models, and multiple linear regression analyses. Missing data were handled under the missing-at-random assumption using mixed-effects modeling. The study hypothesized that systematic lucid dreaming training and imagery control techniques would reduce the frequency and emotional distress associated with REM-related symptoms while improving sleep quality, emotional regulation, and quality of life. Preliminary findings demonstrated clinically significant and sustained reductions in REM-related symptoms, improvements in dream-related metacognitive variables, and better subjective sleep quality and emotional well-being in the intervention group compared with controls.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy for Narcolepsy (CBT-NAR) With Lucid Dreaming and Imagery Control Therapy

A structured six-session behavioral intervention designed for patients with narcolepsy type 1 experiencing REM-related symptoms such as hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis. The intervention integrated cognitive behavioral therapy for narcolepsy (CBT-NAR), lucid dreaming training, and imagery control techniques. Components included psychoeducation about narcolepsy and REM sleep physiology, dream diary monitoring, dream awareness training, lucid dreaming induction and maintenance strategies, reality testing, metacognitive techniques, imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT), emotional regulation strategies, modification of distressing dream content, relapse prevention, and sleep hygiene education focused on sleep-wake regularity and scheduled nap regulation. Sessions were delivered weekly via synchronous telehealth by trained clinical psychologists specialized in behavioral sleep medicine while participants continued stable pharmacological treatment.

BEHAVIORALSleep Hygiene Education and Structured Clinical Follow-up

Participants received structured clinical follow-up and behavioral sleep hygiene psychoeducation while continuing stable pharmacological treatment for narcolepsy. The intervention included education regarding sleep-wake schedule regularity, scheduled naps, healthy sleep habits, management of daytime sleepiness, and general education about narcolepsy and REM-related symptoms. Sessions were delivered remotely through synchronous telehealth contacts with a frequency comparable to routine clinical follow-up. No lucid dreaming training, imagery control techniques, imagery rehearsal therapy, or metacognitive dream interventions were provided in this comparator arm.

Sponsors

Institute of Behavioral Sleep Medicine, Colombia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

(Participants and care providers were not blinded because of the behavioral nature of the intervention, but outcome evaluators and the statistical analyst remained blinded to group allocation.)

Intervention model description

Participants with narcolepsy type 1 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel groups. The experimental group received six weekly 90-minute sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for narcolepsy (CBT-NAR) integrating lucid dreaming training and imagery control therapy in addition to stable pharmacological treatment. The control group continued standard pharmacological treatment combined with structured clinical follow-up and sleep hygiene psychoeducation focused on sleep-wake regulation, scheduled naps, and healthy sleep habits. Outcomes were assessed longitudinally at baseline, post-treatment, 6 months, and 12 months. The study used a parallel-group randomized controlled design to compare changes in REM-related symptoms, sleep quality, metacognitive dream variables, and quality of life between groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged ≥18 years diagnosed with Narcolepsy Type 1, confirmed by clinical evaluation and polysomnography. * Experiencing clinically significant hypnagogic hallucinations and/or sleep paralysis. * Stable pharmacological treatment for narcolepsy, such as modafinil and/or methylphenidate. * Able and willing to provide informed consent electronically. * Available to participate in six weekly virtual intervention sessions. * Willing to adhere to structured medical follow-up, including sleep hygiene education, nap guidance, sleep habit stabilization, and participation in sleep schedule programs.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of severe psychiatric disorders or dissociative disorders. Active use of psychoactive substances during the study period. * Participation in other interventions targeting lucid dreaming or imagery rehearsal during the trial. * Any medical or cognitive condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would interfere with participation or adherence to the intervention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Frequency and Distress of REM-Related Symptoms (Hypnagogic Hallucinations and Sleep Paralysis) measured by Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS)Baseline, post-treatment (6 weeks), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.The primary outcome is the change in frequency and subjective distress of hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis in patients with narcolepsy type 1. Symptoms are assessed using the Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), a validated self-report instrument where each item is scored 0-5; higher scores indicate greater severity. Structured clinical evaluations supplement the NSS to evaluate reductions in REM-related intrusion symptoms and associated emotional burden following the behavioral intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Subjective Sleep Quality Assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Baseline, post-treatment (6 weeks), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.Subjective sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a validated self-report instrument consisting of 7 components, each scored 0-3, with a total score range of 0-21. Lower total scores indicate better sleep quality. The measure assessed perceived sleep quality, sleep disturbances, sleep fragmentation, and overall sleep-related impairment. Changes in PSQI scores were used to evaluate improvement in subjective sleep quality following the intervention.

Countries

Colombia

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRIVAN FRANCISCO IF ALVAREZ OROZCO, MD, MS, PhD (c)

Neumocenter, Valledupar, Colombia

STUDY_CHAIRUlises U Jiménez Correa, MS, PhD

Seep Disorder Clínic, Research Division, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHERNAN ANDRES HA MARIN AGUDELO, MS, PhD, Postdoctoral Research

BEHAVIORAL SLEEP MEDICINE INSTITUTE

STUDY_CHAIRJENNY J JURADO HERNANDEZ, MD, MS

HOSPITAL MILITAR CENTRAL BOGOTÁ

STUDY_CHAIRLiliana L Estrada Chaverri, MD, MS

Sleep Med Costa Rica / Sleep Disorders Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026