Skip to content

A Cognitive Training Intervention for Improving Cognitive and Neurological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma or B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Intervention to Enhance Cognitive Augmentation and Neuroplasticity (I-CAN)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07609030
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-05-27
Start date
2026-04-28
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recurrent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Recurrent Multiple Myeloma, Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

This clinical trial evaluates whether an online cognitive training intervention (Intervention to enhance Cognitive Augmentation and Neuroplasticity \[I-CAN\]), delivered before and after treatment with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, works to improve cognitive and neurological outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has come back after a period of improvement (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Cancer treatment can have significant short and long-term side effects, including cognitive and neurological side effects such as impairments in attention, memory, language, and executive function. The I-CAN program is a form of cognitive training. Cognitive training is a therapeutic approach designed to improve and restore cognitive functioning, based on the brain's ability to reorganize and form new neural connections to accomplish tasks. I-CAN provides five core elements necessary for training the brain to create new neural connections including speed of processing, accuracy of processing, adaptivity, generalizability, and engagement. The I-CAN intervention, when delivered before and after therapy, may help reduce the cognitive side effects of treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To conduct a prospective single arm study of an Intervention to enhance Cognitive Augmentation and Neuroplasticity (I-CAN) program in 90 patients with relapsed B-cell hematologic malignancy receiving chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy (CAR-T). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To examine the neurocognitive change (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition Perceived Cognitive Impairment \[FACT-Cog PCI\]; Montreal Cognitive Assessment \[MoCA\]) from baseline, following the I-CAN program at timepoint 2 (T2)-timepoint 5 (T5) in CAR T recipients. II. To examine the relationship of higher-grade neurotoxicity/cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with change in neurocognitive measures (FACT-Cog PCI, MoCA) from baseline, following the I-CAN program at T2-T5 in CAR T recipients. III. To examine the change in distress (anxiety and depression) and frailty (Fried Frailty Phenotype) from baseline, following the I-CAN program at T2-T5 in CAR-T recipients. IV. To determine the change in molecular markers of aging (Ohio State University \[OSU\] Senescence, epigenetic clock/DNAge, inflammatory cytokines, changes in peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets) before and after CAR-T. V. To examine the association of molecular markers of aging with cognition and frailty (FACT-Cog PCI, Fried Frailty Phenotype) as well as other prognostic factors (e.g. age, disease, CRS/neurotoxicity) before and after CAR-T. VI. To explore the impact of the ICAN program on healthcare utilization (hospital re/admissions, emergency department visits) compared to age and diagnostic-matched historic control from baseline to T5 and examine return to work (role function/work productivity/absenteeism) at each time point, timepoint 1 (T1)-T5. OUTLINE: Patients participate in online I-CAN training sessions over approximately 2.5 hours per week for 4 weeks before and 4 weeks after CAR-T therapy for a total of 20 hours over 8 weeks. Patients also undergo collection of blood samples throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1, 3, and 12 months post-infusion.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBiospecimen Collection

Undergo collection of blood samples

OTHERCognitive Intervention

Participate in I-CAN training sessions

OTHERElectronic Health Record Review

Ancillary studies

OTHERSurvey Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \>= 18 years of age * Diagnosed with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) * Expected to receive an Food and Drug administration (FDA)-approved CAR-T cellular treatment * English literacy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients expected to live \< 6 months * Patients with major medical disorder known to affect cognition, such as stroke, encephalitis, traumatic brain injury, brain surgery * Confirmed Alzheimer disease or other dementia * Previous central nervous system (CNS) radiation * Active intrathecal therapy at time of enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention to enhance cognitive augmentation and neuroplasticity (I-CAN) adherence (feasibility)At 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 5 months (T4) and 14 months (T5)Descriptive statistics will be used to examine adherence, defined as the percent completion of I-CAN cognitive training before and after infusion.
Retention12 months post-infusion, up to 14 monthsDescriptive statistics will be used to examine retention, defined as % follow-up assessments completed.
I-CAN satisfaction (feasibility)At 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 5 months (T4) and 14 months (T5)Descriptive statistics will be used to examine acceptability, defined as % satisfaction on Client Satisfaction Questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition Perceived Cognitive Impairment (FACT-Cog PCI)At 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 5 months (T4) and 14 months (T5)Descriptive statistics and trend plots will be used to examine the FACT-Cog PCI scores over time. Linear mixed models (LMM) for repeated measures will be used to model each neurocognitive measure (FACT-Cog-PCI scores) as a linear function of fixed-effect of time, adjusting for within-subject clustering from repeated measures.
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)At 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 5 months (T4) and 14 months (T5)Descriptive statistics and trend plots will be used to examine the MoCA scores over time. LMM for repeated measures will be used to model each neurocognitive measure (MoCA scores) as a linear function of fixed-effect of time, adjusting for within-subject clustering from repeated measures.
Change in depressionAt 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 5 months (T4) and 14 months (T5)Evaluated by 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Descriptive statistics and trend plots will be used to examine changes over time. LMM for repeated measures will be used to model each outcome as a linear function of fixed-effect of time, adjusting for within-subject clustering from repeated measures.
Change in anxietyAt 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 5 months (T4) and 14 months (T5)Evaluated by 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form version1.0 - Anxiety 8a. Descriptive statistics and trend plots will be used to examine changes over time. LMM for repeated measures will be used to model each outcome as a linear function of fixed-effect of time, adjusting for within-subject clustering from repeated measures.
Change in frailtyAt 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 5 months (T4) and 14 months (T5)Evaluated using Fried's frailty phenotype. Descriptive statistics and trend plots will be used to examine changes over time. LMM for repeated measures will be used to model each outcome as a linear function of fixed-effect of time, adjusting for within-subject clustering from repeated measures.
Healthcare utilization (Number of ER visits)Up to 14 monthsNumber of ER visits for each participant will be assessed at each time point. Data will be collated by review of medical records.
Healthcare utilization (Hospital admissions/readmissions)Up to 14 monthsNumber of hospital admissions / readmissions for each participant will be assessed at each time point. Data will be collated by review of medical records.
Healthcare utilization (Length of Hospital Stay)Up to 14 monthsLength of hospital stay for each participant admitted to the hospital will be assessed at each time point. Data will be collated by review of medical records.
Return to functionUp to 14 monthsReturn to work compared to published data will be evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (physical functioning, social functioning, role functioning).
Direct and indirect costsUp to 14 monthsEconomic evaluation of direct medical costs of healthcare utilization and indirect costs of age-specific work ability/productivity gains/losses.
Income changes due to changes in work productivityUp to 14 monthsIncome changes due to changes in work productivity will be estimated using annual salaries calculated based on educational attainment-matched national averages obtained from Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplements conducted by the United States Census Bureau.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu800-293-5066
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAshley E Rosko, MD

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 28, 2026