Skip to content

Effects of Combined Cervical and Oculomotor Exercises on Dynamic Balance in Elderly

Effects of Combined Cervical and Oculomotor Exercises on Dynamic Balance in Elderly

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07608991
Enrollment
48
Registered
2026-05-27
Start date
2025-11-18
Completion date
2026-05-10
Last updated
2026-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dynamic Balance, Risk of Fall

Keywords

Dynamic Balance, Elderly, Cervical Exercises, Oculomotor Exercises, Otago Exercise Program, Fall Prevention, Dizziness, Postural Control, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

This study focuses on improving balance in elderly individuals (aged 60-80 years) who may experience dizziness or instability while walking or performing daily activities. Poor balance increases the risk of falls, which can lead to serious injuries and loss of independence. The study compares two types of exercise programs: One group performs combined cervical (neck) exercises + eye (oculomotor) exercises + Otago balance exercises The other group performs eye (oculomotor) exercises + Otago balance exercises only These exercises are done 3 times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting 30-45 minutes. The goal is to determine whether combining neck and eye exercises improves balance more effectively than eye exercises alone. This research may help: Reduce fall risk in elderly people Improve mobility and independence Provide better rehabilitation programs for physiotherapists

Detailed description

Falls are a major health concern among older adults, frequently leading to serious injuries , and diminished participation in daily activities, which negatively affect overall quality of life. Therefore, designing effective, accessible, and evidence-based strategies to improve balance and prevent falls is essential for promoting healthy aging.because it introduces a novel approach that combines cervical proprioceptive exercises and oculomotor exercises alongside the Otago exercise program. While previous research has demonstrated that both cervical and oculomotor exercises independently enhance balance and reduce fall risk, their combined effects, particularly when integrated into a structured balance program like Otago, remain largely unexplored. By addressing this gap, the present study offers an innovative strategy that targets multiple systems involved in maintaining postural control., the combined intervention is designed to be practical, cost-effective, and easily implemented in various settings, including clinics, community centers, and at home., the study has the potential to guide physiotherapists and rehabilitation professionals toward adopting more holistic balance training protocols. Ultimately, the findings may contribute to reducing fall rates, promoting independence, and enhancing the overall quality of life in the elderly population.

Interventions

PROCEDUREocculomotor with otago exercises

Smooth pursuit exercises, where the eyes follow a moving target horizontally, vertically, and diagonally while keeping the head still. Saccadic eye movements, involving quick shifts of gaze between two stationary targets. Gaze stability (VOR x1 and VOR x2) exercises, involving head movements while maintaining focus on a target, and moving the head and target in opposite directions. All participants will perform the Otago exercise program, a well-established, evidence-based fall prevention program focusing on lower limb strengthening and dynamic balance. It includes: * Strengthening exercises (e.g., knee extensions, hip abduction, calf raises). * Static and dynamic balance exercises (e.g., tandem stance, backward walking, sit-to-stand without using hands). * A progressive walking plan to improve endurance and confidence during ambulation.

PROCEDURECombined Cervical and Oculomotor Exercises with Otago Exercises

Cervical range of motion exercises in flexion, extension, rotation, and side bending (gentle, controlled movements). Chin tuck exercises in supine or sitting positions to activate deep cervical flexors. Isometric neck strengthening exercises (flexion, extension, lateral flexion), focusing on controlled, static holds. Occulomotor Exercises: Smooth pursuit exercises, where the eyes follow a moving target horizontally, vertically, and diagonally while keeping the head still. Saccadic eye movements, involving quick shifts of gaze between two stationary targets. Gaze stability (VOR x1 and VOR x2) exercises, involving head movements while maintaining focus on a target, and moving the head in opposite direction Otago exercises Strengthening exercises (e.g., knee extensions, hip abduction, calf raises). Static and dynamic balance exercises (e.g., tandem stance, backward walking, sit-to-stand without using hands). A progressive walking plan to improve endurance and confidence during ambulation.

Sponsors

Foundation University Islamabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female participants aged 60-80 years. * DHI-mild score(0-30) * Ability to follow instructions and participate in exercises. * BBS moderate (21-40) * Normal to corrected vision * Negative Dix Hallpike

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed vestibular disorders * Neurological or musculoskeletal conditions affecting balance. * Patients with VBI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dynamic Balance6 weeksBerg Balance Scale (BBS) was used Cut-off Values Greater than 45 → Increased risk of falls 21-40 → Moderate balance impairment Outcome Interpretation Higher score = Better balance
Functional Mobility6 weeksThe Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) was used Cut-off Values: less than 10 seconds → Normal mobility 10-19 seconds → Good mobility 20-29 seconds → Mild impairment * 30 seconds → Severe impairment \> 13.5 seconds → Increased risk of falls (important clinical cutoff) Interpretation: Lower time indicates better performance
Dizziness related disability6 weeks4\. Dizziness Handicap was used Cut-off Values: 0-30 → Mild handicap (used in inclusion criteria) 31-60 → Moderate handicap 61-100 → Severe handicap Interpretation: Higher score indicates greater dizziness-related disability

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 28, 2026