Skip to content

Comparing Decidual Inclusion vs. Exclusion in Uterine Suture Techniques During Cesarean Section to Improve Scar Thickness and Reduce Isthmocele Risk in Primiparous Women

The Impact of Decidual Inclusion or Sparing in a Single Unlocked Closure of a Cesarean Uterine Incision: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07608874
Acronym
DISSUC
Enrollment
374
Registered
2026-05-27
Start date
2026-06-17
Completion date
2029-05-30
Last updated
2026-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Scar Diverticula, Isthmocele

Keywords

isthmocele, Uterine closure techniques, Decidual inclusion, Decidual sparing, Cesarean section, Scar thickness, Niche formation, Sonography, Dyspareunia

Brief summary

This study compares two ways of closing the uterus during cesarean delivery. In one group, the decidual layer near the uterine cavity is included in the suture. In the other group, this layer is left out. The study will examine whether these two methods differ in how well the uterine scar heals 6 to 9 months after surgery. Women having an elective cesarean delivery will be randomly assigned to one of the two closure methods. Scar healing will be assessed by ultrasound after delivery. The goal is to determine whether one method is associated with better cesarean scar healing and fewer scar defects.

Detailed description

Cesarean scar defects, also referred to as niches or isthmoceles, are associated with gynecologic symptoms and adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. The effect of uterine closure technique on scar healing remains uncertain, particularly with regard to whether the cavum-near decidual layer should be included in or excluded from the suture during cesarean closure. This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing two approaches to single-layer, non-locked uterine closure during elective cesarean delivery: decidual inclusion and decidual sparing. In both study groups, all operative steps are standardized except for the handling of the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin. Participants will be followed 6 to 9 months after cesarean delivery, including blinded ultrasound assessment of cesarean scar healing. The objective is to determine whether decidual inclusion or decidual sparing is associated with differences in postoperative uterine scar healing and cesarean scar defect formation.

Interventions

PROCEDURESingle-Layered Non-Locked Closure with Decidual Inclusion

During the cesarean section, the uterine incision is closed with a single-layered, non-locked suture. In this technique, the decidua (the uterine lining) is included in the closure. This means that the endometrial cells are part of the suture, potentially influencing the healing process of the uterine scar. Goal: The idea is that including the decidua may promote better healing and scar formation, reducing the risk of complications such as isthmocele and improving long-term uterine health.

PROCEDURESingle-Layered Non-Locked Closure with Decidual Sparing

Procedure: In this technique, the uterine incision is also closed using a single-layered non-locked suture, but the decidua is excluded from the closure. The suture is placed only through the myometrium (muscle layer) of the uterus, leaving the decidua out of the scar tissue. Goal: The intent is to observe if sparing the decidua results in better scar healing and a lower risk of isthmocele formation, as well as fewer long-term complications.

Sponsors

Kantonsspital Baden
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Singleton, term pregnancy * Elective cesarean section before labor onset or membrane rupture * Maternal age \>18 years * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Placenta previa * Maternal substance abuse or infection * Suspected placenta accreta * Diabetes * one or more prior cesarean section * Vulnerable participants (e.g., mental health conditions) * Emergency cesarean sections

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants with a cesarean scar niche measured by ultrasound6 to 9 months post-operationPresence of a cesarean scar niche, defined as a myometrial indentation at the cesarean scar site with a depth of at least 2 mm, assessed by postoperative ultrasound. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of participants with a niche in each treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative timePeriproceduralOperative time in minutes
Need for additional sutures for hemostasisPeriproceduralNeed for additional hemostatic sutures, yes (how many: \_\_ Number) /no
Length of hospital stayPostoperative day 2Length of postoperative hospital stay in days
Postoperative pain intensity on the 11-point Numeric Rating ScalePostoperative day 2Pain intensity assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Postoperative bleedingPostoperative day 2Clinically relevant postoperative bleeding, yes/no
Wound infectionPostoperative day 2Postoperative wound infection, yes/no
Postoperative feverPostoperative day 2Postoperative fever, yes/no
Abnormal uterine bleeding6 to 9 months post-operationAbnormal uterine bleeding reported at follow-up, yes/no
Dysmenorrhea6 to 9 months post-operationDysmenorrhea reported at follow-up, yes/no
Chronic pelvic pain6 to 9 months post-operationChronic pelvic pain reported at follow-up, yes/no
Dyspareunia6 to 9 months post-operationDyspareunia reported at follow-up, yes/no
Cesarean scar niche length measured by ultrasound in mm6 to 9 months post-operationLength of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
Cesarean scar niche depth measured by ultrasound in mm6 to 9 months post-operationDepth of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
Cesarean scar niche width measured by ultrasound in mm6 to 9 months post-operationWidth of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
Residual myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound in mm6 to 9 months post-operationResidual myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound in mm
Presence of intrauterine fluid on ultrasound6 to 9 months post-operationPresence or absence of intrauterine fluid on ultrasound.
Residual-to-adjacent myometrial thickness ratio6 to 9 months post-operationRatio of residual myometrial thickness to adjacent myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound.

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

CONTACTAmr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof.
amr.hamza@ksb.ch+41564863513
CONTACTLeonhard Schaeffer, Prof.
leonhard.schaeffer@ksb.ch+41564863506
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAmr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof.

Kantonsspital Baden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 26, 2026