Skip to content

Assessment of the Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Proinflammatory Mechanisms Induced by Systemic Treatment in Women With Breast Cancer

A 8-week, Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Proinflammatory Mechanisms Induced by Systemic Treatment in Women With Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07607548
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-05-26
Start date
2022-10-18
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2026-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Probiotic Therapy

Keywords

systemic treatment, inflammation

Brief summary

The gut microbiota and its role in cancer treatment are currently the subject of intensive research. It has long been known that interactions between the microbiome and the host are responsible for the proper functioning of many physiological processes and for maintaining systemic homeostasis. Although the precise mechanisms underlying these interactions remain unclear, they appear to have a significant impact on the development and treatment of various diseases, including cancer. One of the crucial functions regulated by the gut microbiota is the body's immune response. The appropriate quantitative and qualitative composition of the gut microbiota supports the maintenance of a critical balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory processes. Even a slight disruption of this balance can lead to systemic metabolic and biochemical changes, affecting the overall condition of the body and its systems. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy are standard treatment protocols for cancer patients, including those with breast cancer. Despite their proven role in prolonging remission and improving patient survival, their effectiveness remains limited. Regardless of the regimen, the use of cytotoxic drugs does not fully prevent metastasis. In women with breast cancer, the risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis-primarily to the bones, lungs, and liver-is approximately 30% and increases over time following the initial diagnosis. Although the risk of cancer recurrence in this group is largely influenced by the baseline characteristics of the tumor, increasing attention is being paid to the immune response to treatment. The effectiveness of anticancer therapies depends not only on the response of cancer cells but also on the condition of the entire organism, particularly the host's immune system. Recent studies indicate that chemotherapy induces a systemic inflammatory state that may persist long after treatment completion. Prolonged inflammation, along with increased levels of chemoattractants, cytokines, and metalloproteinases, creates an environment conducive to cancer progression and metastasis. Therefore, it is increasingly suggested that chemotherapy-induced chronic inflammation may be a significant factor limiting therapeutic effectiveness. Although the precise mechanisms underlying inflammation during chemotherapy are not fully understood, a growing body of evidence points to a key role of the gut microbiota in this process. Cytotoxic drugs used during chemotherapy disrupt both the quantitative and qualitative composition of the gut microbiota, leading to dysbiosis. Dysbiosis is associated with the overgrowth of pathogenic species and alterations in the profile of microbial metabolites, often favoring those that negatively affect the intestinal barrier. Consequently, inflammation of the intestinal mucosa and increased intestinal permeability are observed during chemotherapy. Bacterial components, collectively known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), can enter the bloodstream through the compromised intestinal barrier, triggering immune cell activation and systemic inflammation. An important link between the gut microbiota and progressive inflammation involves Toll-like receptors (TLRs), particularly TLR4, which is expressed on the surface of monocytes and recognizes, among other ligands, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) produced by Gram-negative bacteria. This interaction activates transcription factors such as Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), leading to the expression of genes involved in the immune response, including pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). These cytokines promote tumor progression and metastasis both directly, by acting on cancer cells, and indirectly, by enhancing cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Several studies have reported increased expression and activity of TLR4 in various types of cancer, including breast cancer. Animal model studies have shown that blocking TLR4 reduces tumor metastasis and significantly decreases invasiveness. Therefore, inhibition of TLR4 signaling appears to be a promising therapeutic strategy for counteracting metastasis and chemoresistance. Probiotic therapy may contribute to this effect, as it has been shown to downregulate TLR4 expression and reduce levels of pro-tumor inflammatory mediators. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of probiotic therapy on immunological, biochemical, morphological, and anthropometric parameters in a group of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The study will include two visits: one before treatment initiation and another eight weeks later. The main hypothesis is that probiotic supplementation will reduce inflammation associated with systemic breast cancer treatment.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTProbiotic

The probiotic contained the Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v. It was prepared by Sanprobi Sp. z o.o., Sp. k., Szczecin, Poland; probiotic capsules manufacturer - Institute Rosell-Lallemand, Montreal, Canada; Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v strain owner - Probi AB, Lund, Sweden. Placebo supplementation began on the day of chemotherapy initiation, according to the following regimen: 1 capsule/day in the first week (1 x 1010 colony-forming unit (CFU)), and 2 capsules/day in the following weeks (2 x 1010 CFU). The supplementation period lasted eight weeks.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

The placebo contained crystalline cellulose powder. It was prepared by Sanprobi Sp. z o.o., Sp. k., Szczecin, Poland.. Placebo supplementation began on the day of chemotherapy initiation and lasted eight weeks.

Sponsors

Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER
Sanprobi Sp. z o.o., Sp. k., Szczecin, Poland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* first-time chemotherapy * written consent to participate in the research * no antibiotic and probiotic therapy in the last 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* serious comorbidities (chronic renal failure, diabetes, autoimmune diseasese, unstable coronary artery disease or other cancers) * previous history of cancer * smoking cigarettes or using other stimulants * another probiotic supplementation * qualification for another type of treatment - surgery or hormone therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in serum levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNFα)Baseline, 8 week
Changes in serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6)Baseline, 8 week
Changes in serum levels of high-specific C-reactive protein (hsCRP)Baseline, 8 week
Changes in Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR) expression on the surface of monocytesBaseline, 8 week
Changes in the intracellular expression of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2)Baseline, 8 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in the concentration of lymphocytesBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as G/L, marked routinely in the hospital laboratory
Changes in the concentration of leukocytesBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[G/L\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in the concentration of monocytesBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as G/L, marked routinely in the hospital laboratory
Changes in the concentration of neutrophilsBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as G/L, marked routinely in the hospital laboratory
Changes in the concentration of erythrocytesBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[T/L\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in the concentration of hemoglobinBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[g/dL\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in the levels of hematocritBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[L/L\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in the concentration of blood plateletsBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[G/L\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in serum levels of total cholesterolBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[mg/dL\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in serum levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterolBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[mg/dL\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in serum levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterolBaseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[mg/dL\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in serum levels of triglycerides (TG)Baseline, 8 weekResults expressed as \[mg/dL\], marked routinely in the hospital laboratory.
Changes in body weightBaseline, 8 weekResults presented in kg, measured with a certified body composition analyzer
Body height measurementBaselineResults presented in m, measured with a certified height gauge
Changes of body fat contentBaseline, 8 weekResults presented in kg of body weight, measured with a certified body composition analyzer
Changes of free fat mass contentBaseline, 8 weekResults presented in kg, measured with a certified body composition analyzer
Changes of total body waterBaseline, 8 weekResults presented in kg, measured with a certified body composition analyzer

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 27, 2026